The number of skeletons inside of a human body is statistically greater than 1.
I don’t get this one…?
This might help
actually, you’re forgetting about amputees and people born with fewer limbs. it’s likely less than 1.
Skeleton, not bones. Amputees still have.a skeleton, don’t they?
I lost my skele back in 'nam
the question is: is a skeleton that’s missing pieces still “one skeleton”? And if so, at which point does it become not a skeleton? Because i’m reasonably sure you wouldn’t call a severed foot a skeleton even though it is still arguably “one skeleton” that is just missing a lot of pieces.
i think a skeleton is just multiple bones together that are attached. A pile of bones isn’t a skeleton, it’s a pile of bones
so by your definition a severed foot is, indeed, a skeleton. huh.
If an anthropologist found a 2-million year old intact foot, I think they’d call it a skeleton, sure.
i somehow have a feeling that they’d call that a partial skeleton (aka. less than one)
Unless there’s a lot of dudes with 3 it really is less than 1 on average.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/737923/us-population-by-gender/
Shut up before we start talking about p values…
p is stored in the balls…
Did you just assume my p-values!?
68% of statistical facts are incorrect, including this one
For every snake on Earth, there is one snake dick. Half of all snakes are female.
I’m partially responsible for this stat
Aren’t we all?
Ya, but I’m also why the number is less than two
In a few months I’ll be doing my part to lower the average
best of luck with your lopemoffomy
