• whileloop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the world is going towards simplified logos, gotta at least make yours good. Firefox did that. Can’t complain.

  • Odo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow. I’m surprised at the dislike for the old detailed icon. Maybe it’s being old enough to remember black and white icons, but I miss the increasing amount of colors that icons had for a while there. I hate the trend toward monocolor silhouettes.

  • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    “What happened to me? People care more about polished functionality than their privacy, and are willing to trade privacy for something that steals all their data as long as it is “faster,” even though I’m arguably faster than Chrome at this point…”

    Most regular ass people don’t give one flying fuck about being owned by corporations, they’re happy to get reamed by companies that don’t give a shit if they live or die.

  • aggelalex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The new one looks so much better than that overdetailed crap, I don’t want a painting, I want an easily discernable icon. Also, I can’t believe we’re still doing Firefox so many years after its new logo debuted, especially since Thunderbird just changed their logo. In my opinion, it seems like people are just reiterating the same joke some bloke did without even looking up the why and how. And before you ask, yes I prefer the new Thunderbird logo too, it’s much more discernable.

  • igorlogius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Side by side the old logo looks nicer … but i guess the simplified logo fits better into most desktop enviroments (out of the box), maybe since most other apps now also seem to use such designs.