• SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh gendered pronouns are fun in german.

    Especially when combining the male and female version of a word to one gender neutral word.

    For example doctor:

    Arzt (male) + Ärztin (female) = ärzt’in (Singular) / ärzte’innen (Plural)

    • vierbl00m@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you sure? I think for plural it would be ärzt*innen, without the e, but i’m no expert

      • Krachsterben@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re right but tbh I think it’s so silly that using* stars has become the defacto politically correct way to address gendering in the first place. It’s such an eyesore

          • Krachsterben@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s still dumb. When we’re at a point where we have to butcher our language with asterisks and colons to please Karens we’ve gotta admit that the language itself is heavily flawed.

            Turns out English and Asian languages without gendered pronouns are simply superior

            • vierbl00m@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              please Karens

              what do you mean by that?

              gotta admit that the language itself is heavily flawed

              Are you proposing to get rid of the German language because it is flawed, instead of adapting it? First time i heard that idea

  • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait until you hear about languages where everything is gendered.

    We’re currently debating, whether BürgerInnen, Bürger:innen or “Bürgerinnen und Bürger” is the proper way to address all citizens. This is not even about anything LGBTQ, it’s simply acknowledgement of the concept of non-male people (which is really hard for some conservatives).

    • Interesting_Test_814@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In French we have a similar problem. Currently the most popular form is “citoyen.ne.s” or “citoyen.nes” (besides the good old “citoyens” or “citoyennes et citoyens”), which sometimes gets rendered as a website by some text displayers (e.g. les habitant.es). It’s technically supposed to be a middle dot (citoyen·ne·s) but nobody has that on their keyboard (I literally had to copy-paste it from wikipedia) so people use the point instead. We used to use parentheses like “citoyen(ne)s” but these have vastly be replaced by the dots.

    • ivenoidea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Austrian state I used to live in (Niederösterreich) actually just outlawed gendering words like that on any government documents. Absolutely idiotic.

    • uberrice@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or, you know. Just Bürger, the generic masculinum. That all-inclusive. And it worked for a long time. It’s only because some snowflakes thought they needed something to complain about that we’re having this whole debate.