archive.today and archive.ph (also .is, .md, .fo, .li, .vn) are DDOSing a blogger who investigated them. They could also be Russian assets (js from mail[.]ru).
I get it, esp. in a professional environment.
But “Schrödinger’s data” rubs me the wrong way. The point OOP’s making is not a question of whether the data is there or not, it’s a question of whether you can restore a botched system with a few commands and in a realistic amount of time.
Case in point: I (private person, private system) never needed to fully restore, knock on wood. But the data is there - I have (manually) restored single files or directories on a few occasions.
Yeah we’re going to see much more of this moving forward. Yesterday i installed Linux for a friend and they asked about fixing problems. I told them to always look at the date & compatibility when they search for solutions. They then volunteered: “and I guess I can always ask ChatGPT, it’s pretty good with these things”. I grunted non-committally.
Bool me once, shame on thee. Bool me twice, shame on me.
deleted by creator
I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Bash, does in fact apply to all UNIX-like shells.
but I like nano!
What about nano? Is it OK to choose a safe middle ground? I mean with ed I could just as well use butterflies.
BTW, notepad++ is popular on Windows. That’s the sort of software what gets hijacked.
🤔 what does it say when you tell it something like “look, this is wrong, and this is why, can you please fix that”? In a general sense, not going into technical aspects like what OOP is describing.