The joke is that, regardless of how the type is declared in json, you are parsing a string. (your json blob is just a series of characters, not raw binary data)
The joke is that, regardless of how the type is declared in json, you are parsing a string. (your json blob is just a series of characters, not raw binary data)
The reply would have been return x % 2 == 0
, or if you wanted it to be less readable return !(x&1)
.
But if you were going for a way that is subtly awful or expensive, just do a regex match on “[02468]$”. You don’t get a stack overflow with larger numbers but I struggle to think of a plausible bit of code that consumes more unnnecessary cycles than that…
Is this meant to be a joke or is it intended to be a serious solution?
Asking for someone who lacks a sense of humor.
Ok, fine, I’m asking for me. That person is me.
Jokes on you – I’m still using the last TV I bought in 2005. It has 2 HDMI ports and supports 1080i!
Missed opportunity in the last panel: “that’s a right, Mario!”
deleted by creator
I can’t be the only one disappointed by the lack of an order by clause after being told the list was being sorted (twice!)…
That’s because it is absolutely terrible. It is the first serious/real “language” I have encountered since Cobol where indent level has functional meaning. This is not good company to be in.
Omg, I have SOOoo many questions about what is going on in this picture.
Unsubscribe
My guy wanted to use drones to cut hedges.
m68k assembly was my favorite back in the day.