No, the reason is that his books are anticommunist drivel and projection masquaraded as accessible political theory. They serve to teach you anticommunism and liberalism.

One time payment, not even subscription?

Plurality of views, libs should be happy they can access censored media posted by dissidents who could face arrest for it in Europe. Yet they are for some reason incredibly mad about it, could it be that they lie about the freeze peach?

Western media still hate him because his theory (if they remember him that is), one Italian fucker even wrote a book that Gramsci turned marxism into fascism and thus every modern marxist is a fascist. Funnily enough they seem to recognise importance of Gramsci theory more than ultras and dogmatists.

Probably shipost of meme swiped from somewhere, OP is not known for being American exceptionalist.

Yes, but i think meme is calling the communists who sometimes have such opinion as “libs”. Dogmatists from reddit who misinterpret Lenin are like this quite often. But indeed this is very rare here on lemmy.

They heard screams of PLA soldiers being burned alive

Dont as such questions if you dont want your posts to suddenly

Yeah, when the offices are full, it’s “a prestigious bustling hub of entrepreneurship” or whatever and it’s worth loads, but when there is a lot of empty offices for hire it’s “business slum” and the value is tanking, especially if its built outside city center.

To be fair, Ukraine killing kids is not something you could hear about in th US-European propaganda bubble, especially that they banned Russian media.

Which leds me to another point that is the libs supposedly hating censorship and loving plurality of views, but when jankoflife expose them to plurality of views and allow them to glimpse behind the censorship, they get unbelivably mad at him for some reason, instead of getting mad at those who kill kids and those who censor this fact. Reminds me how they always were about Palestine too.

Uhh no, I’m saying they didn’t win the war because they couldn’t meet their stated goals

I mean yeah that usually work like that but USA are in entire another layer of hypocrisy, their stated war goald are only a political theatre for their population, plausible deniality and propaganda purposes.

My bad for assuming, btw.

No problem

They are the most prominent US socialdemocrats, a faces of that ideology in USA, which is even more bankrupted than socialdemocrats outside USA.

You believe US when they state the war reasons and goals? Lol, lmao even. They achieved a real war goal of stopping Iraq and Libya from breaking dollar monopoly on oil sale.

Also it’s not my government, my government was actually quite honest, they admitted they went there to bootlick USA and loot Iraq.

1st Iraq was a clear win, both militarily and strategically. 2nd Iraq and Libya were strategic victories because the real purpose was to maintain the petrodollar, which was attained.

Tibetan is dying out as a language

It isn’t though, that’s just RFA claim.

Lmao you are literally doing Warhammer memes +++Blessed is the mind too small for doubt+++

One country invaded another, that much is clear.

What do you think happened October 16, 1944 or September 11, 1944?

You want a socialist society with zero exploitation, zero inequality, and zero contradictions.

Nah, he’s a Polish nationalist and a debate pervert troll, he want all socialism crash and burn, he just adopts ultra rhetorics because it make him appear as if he was on the left.

Last elections in Poland seen a whooping 17 parties and over 40 independents elected to sejm. However, you could not find a single socialist among them, not to mention communist, all 17 parties and over 40 independents are representing various flavours of liberalism