Victim of Communism

  • 10 Posts
  • 2.31K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle





  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.world•Been there
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    because like half of all women are into astrology

    In the same way that half of all men are into video games, sure.

    they get really really angry with you if you don’t take them seriously when they start lecturing you about it

    I’ve definitely had girls explain it to me. And I’ve stepped in it when I teased one too hard, because she just read me as an obnoxious prick (which… in my early 20s… she wasn’t wrong).

    But I see astrology get the same treatment as veganism. You mention, in passing, that you’re into a thing. People line up around the block to heckle you and argue with you and scream slurs at you. And for some reason this doesn’t really change you opinion on The Thing You’re Into. It just changes your opinion on dating or on talking to anyone outside your insulated The Thing community.


  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.world•Been there
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 days ago

    Dated a girl and, while we were walking through the park, she points up at the sky. “Oh look, Chemtrails”. I absolutely bust up laughing, because I assume I’ve accidentally stepped into a relationship with a conspiracy theorist. She looks incredibly confused. I explain what chemtrails are. She gets even more confused. We whip out our phones for a minute. She says, “Omg I meant contrails”

    She’s a lawyer at a white shoe firm now and makes, like, twice as much as I do in IT. Also, absolutely incredible in the sack.






  • one is even convinced that I’m gonna get divorced just because he did and views all marriages that way

    Classic Divorced Guy

    there is one friend in the group who agrees with me that our wives are our best friends and soulmates

    Wife and I joke about how we can never get divorced because it would be too awkward when we kept hanging out as friends.

    But we also have a friend couple that did get divorced, and still hang out regularly on very good terms.



  • Here’s the Reddit rumor mill, but it’s consistently with what I’ve also heard.

    It basically boils down to his home life falling apart, him doing pornography (VGLewds) to make ends meet, the toxic stew of internet culture wearing away at his ego, and him giving up on any project almost entirely for the last four years.

    Hardly the only webcomics artist to have a tragic spiral. The Sinfest guy also really went hard off the deep end and has taken to churning out some of the most nakedly fascist comics I’ve read to date.



  • It’s funny, because I remember playing Persona 5 and seeing that statue in Shibuya Square every time I’m running to the train.

    And then I visit Tokyo and there it is. Like getting to meet a celebrity IRL. Except it’s a statue. And there’s a someone next to it with an Imperial Japanese flag screaming fascist shit in Japanese. And at the crosswalk there was a guy with his dick out flashing people.

    Japan is a magical place.





  • Voting can definitely bring change. Look at Zohran Mamdani in NYC.

    Zohran is a nice change of pace, but we’re way to early in his administration to know whether he’ll bring concrete social change to the city. New York has had decent mayors before. And they’ve left their footprints. But they’ve also had plenty of corrupt shitheads and racist asshats who climb into Gracie Mansion right on the heels of their betters.

    But if you’re not satisfied with voting alone then you can get more involved with politics.

    The fundamental problem with electoralism - and this is a critique that easily goes back to the first Obama campaign - is that election day often disperses the force that the campaign had originally assembled. What’s notable about Zohran (and a lot of the DSA affiliates) is that they come into office and maintain or expand the organizations that put them there.

    Compare that to say, the Beto Campaign in Texas or the Fetterman Campaign in Pennsylvania or Polis in Colorado. Win or Lose, they disintegrate within a few weeks of the votes being counted. Often, they produce legacy candidates that act in direct opposition to the people who put them there. And that sows distrust in the movements that produced them.

    So I might argue that you get involved in an organization you like first. And then you make decisions within that organization collectively. And sometimes that means supporting a candidate. Sometimes that means recognizing there’s nobody worth voting for in a given race and agreeing - collectively - that you’re not going to support anyone. But the root of the organization is in the organization, not in the voting.

    Just going out and slapping buttons and saying “Okay what’s next?” is a sucker’s gambit.