Yeah ofc females is an issue. We have the word “women” which is more specific and less loaded.

And no, tits aren’t sexual by essence. No body parts are and it’s all social constructs.

• Peoples who don’t traditionally cover their chests don’t tend to sexualize breasts either.
• At some point in France, ankles used to be sexualised. It seems silly now, doesn’t it?

Plus lil kids tend to already see lots of tits since they feed on them.

Yes I am weird but I’m also right 😉

The word females is an issue

We have this neat little concept called “women” that is specific to humans and also refers to a social role.

Using “female” is - by opposition - quite dehumanizing.

but if they got their tits out in public in-front of lil kids…. Thats ok???

First and foremost, kids spent their first few monthes suckling on tits. They kinda know what they look like. Or should breastfeeding women hide their breast from their infants? 🤣

Then sexualising parts of the human body is a social construct:

• Peoples who don’t usually cover their chests don’t tend to sexualise breasts either.
• At some point it was considered inappropriate to show your ankles for a woman. It seems silly now doesn’t it?

So since human breasts (and any body part by extension) aren’t intrinsically sexual, there should be no issue showing them to anyone, kids included.

(Otoh I am obv not condoning any interactions with any kind of sexual intent with minors or young adults with a significant age gap)

Youre weird af

I am but I am also right 😉

https://www.ekospolitics.com/index.php/2024/08/conservative-party-experiences-largest-decline-since-pierre-poilievre-assumed-leadership/ Reverse image search exists, you know