• Hot Saucerman@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Except this is really reductionist and ignores there is very little “open hardware” out there, and few people producing it. So while you might have access to the “means of production” through software, you absolutely do not in hardware.

    Great that software tools are in the hands of the worker, but the means to fabricate the machines that code runs are definitively not owned by workers. (To say nothing of issues with getting drivers for a DIY motherboard working with Linux long-term.)

    Also, not everyone is born to code, so it’s a bit elitist.

    • onkyo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can use FOSS without knowing how to code though. I wasn’t completely serious I know Marx didn’t predict FOSS but I do think it’s an example of how the means of production being shared could look like. It would be great if that also included open hardware as well.

      Edit: I realize it means the workers doesn’t actually own the means of production but it’s a step in that direction and I don’t think it contradicts what Marx said is my point.