You’re the one who thinks that the CEO to worker pay ratio is literally only about the CEO. You also think that cash on hand can be freely distributed to workers if that’s what management wants. I’m not the idiot here. You are.
If you mean something other than CEO to worker pay, perhaps you should articulate that. You still have not made any sense whatsoever.
Cash on hand can absolutely be spent in a wide variety of ways, be it M&A, disaster scenarios, or sudden changes to business structure. That’s one of the most significant purposes of cash on hand.
Have you ever worked in a senior position at a company? Ever run your own business?
You two stop. You are acting like people who misunderstand each other because of words, but are flinging around attacks because the medium is restricting your ability to have a constructive discussion. Now kiss and make up
Everyone who is not an idiot knows that it’s about executive pay in general vs worker pay.
Lol this is nonsense.
First off, executives are literally workers. You claim to have an MBA in your post history yet you understand nothing about how businesses actually work
I didn’t specify that at all?
Do you understand what cash on hand is?
You say the math is written out, and then compare one overpaid person to the number of striking workers. Pretty dumb.
And you’re the one that doesn’t understand cash or shareholders.
deleted by creator
I do exactly the opposite of that, actually.
You literally have as much time as you’d like to read and parse that post, and can even ask me questions if the words are too confusing.
Hint:
This is suggesting robbing the CEO to pay Paul is not the slam dunk win people (including NIMBY Robert Reich) think it is.
You don’t even understand your own words, amazing.
Are you actually illiterate?
You’re the one who thinks that the CEO to worker pay ratio is literally only about the CEO. You also think that cash on hand can be freely distributed to workers if that’s what management wants. I’m not the idiot here. You are.
If you mean something other than CEO to worker pay, perhaps you should articulate that. You still have not made any sense whatsoever.
Cash on hand can absolutely be spent in a wide variety of ways, be it M&A, disaster scenarios, or sudden changes to business structure. That’s one of the most significant purposes of cash on hand.
Have you ever worked in a senior position at a company? Ever run your own business?
Everyone who is not an idiot knows that it’s about executive pay in general vs worker pay.
Way to not address the specific point I made about cash. But answer this instead: who owns the cash a company generates?
You two stop. You are acting like people who misunderstand each other because of words, but are flinging around attacks because the medium is restricting your ability to have a constructive discussion. Now kiss and make up
Lol this is nonsense.
First off, executives are literally workers. You claim to have an MBA in your post history yet you understand nothing about how businesses actually work