• ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        It’s crazy because while that could read as a threat, it could just as easily be read like: “You’re doing the same thing that got that insurance ceo killed. You’re (i.e. your company, people like you, etc are) probably next on the list if this keeps happening to people.”

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          That kind of is the threat? The dumb thing is the worker on the phone shouldn’t feel threatened because (s)he isn’t a stinking rich CEO.

          • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            But that scenario definitely does not meet the legal definition of a threat. It’s just a statement of opinion based on current events - she did not threaten anyone necessarily

            • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 days ago

              I should have clarified - that’s the threat that those prosecuting her are referring to. It is a threat by any contextual interpretation, but it’s indeed harmless in comparison to other things that people get away with without consequences all the time. For example murderers in uniform.

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 days ago

      Woman says defend, deny, depose, and you’re next to healthcare insurance workers on a recorded zoom call. They arrested her and have her held on $100k bail.