• Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 days ago

    Unsure is /s, but doesn’t seem like it.

    Reproductive health advocates are not mass murdering children. You’re thinking of guns, drugs, and cars if you are in the USA, cancer and other genetic defects if in the UK.

      • Holyginz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 days ago

        We get it, you don’t have any scientific knowledge and only go by what religion “says”

          • Holyginz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            10 days ago

            Scientific knowledge shows that a fetus is a lump of cells with no more consciousness than an amoeba that can’t exist without the host which makes it closer to a parasite. That’s not a baby or a person. You need to actually be able to understand more than a one sentence statement to grasp the vast majority of scientific knowledge.

      • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        K. I’m going to get back to work for my company that is mass murdering children by lowering employee reproductive health. (/s)

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          Your taxes may also go towards murdering kids, whether it be state funded abortions or bombing Gaza

          • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            Those two examples are wildly different from eachother. One is a medical procedure involving theoretical children, and the other has real kids getting injured and killed.

            Edit: wanted to add that the medical procedure is always to prevent a major health issue when being funded by state taxes.

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              Whenever the israelis bomb the buildings, they don’t know for certain there are kids in there. They are just theoretical kids in the moment to them.

              • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                10 days ago

                More like, Schrodinger’s kids. I genuinely hope you find peace and learn to not let being pro-birth justify letting others suffer and/or die. Red tape and bans kill when it comes to healthcare, without solving anything.

                • Flax@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  A successful abortion always has at least a 100% fatality rate.

                  • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    10 days ago

                    Oh, so the mother’s die every time?

                    Even under your bad definition it’d be only 50-60% (accounting for the fact that some mothers do die)

                  • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    9 days ago

                    Why does that matter? If the fetus cannot survive outside the womb due to genetic defects, why would I care about that when I could care about the health of the mother?