andioop@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 9 days agowell that's rudeprogramming.devimagemessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up11.21K
arrow-up11.21Kimagewell that's rudeprogramming.devandioop@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up58·edit-29 days agoAt least it seems more “scientific” than anything that Jung ever did. https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/13027/is-there-a-reasonable-scientific-backing-for-carl-jungs-type-theories
At least it seems more “scientific” than anything that Jung ever did.
https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/13027/is-there-a-reasonable-scientific-backing-for-carl-jungs-type-theories