Todd Howard: “You may need to upgrade your PC for this game”

  • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well in my case it is up to the standard, because it’s run perfectly fine for me. I installed it, and have been running it on high graphics with no crashes, and only minor positioning bugs.

    So you and I have had very different experiences with the game.

    • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The nature of PCs I guess. I ran it on an i9 12900k, 2070s GPU, 48gb ram, m2 SSD, xbox gamepass and had no end of troubles. Even once I got it running, a majority of quests (inc main quests) were bugged to the point I had to use console commands to get past the bugs.

      I’m by far not the only one. People were crashing on console! That’s insane. We now pay to be bugtesters.

      • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I have a Ryzen 5600X, 32 GB Ram, Radeon 5700 XT, installed on an SSD, and gamepass as well. I’ve had no issues, other than a single spinning spaceship, and my follower getting stuck on a doorframe temporarily.

        Crazy the variety of experiences.

        And crashing on consoles I just expect now, devs are making games way too demanding for base level consoles.

        • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you notice the difference between our systems? Yours is AMD cpu / AMD gpu, mine is intel cpu / nvidia gpu. We know AMD worked with BGS to some extent to make sure Starfield was well-optimised for their gear. I had a bit of a paranoid moment during my struggles to get it running that BGS had deliberately not optimised the game for non-AMD components and this info does not assuage my paranoia haha.