• raptir@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Why can’t we just have cool multiplayer modes in games instead of a separate game?

    • Moonguide@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Honestly, I prefer this, as long as the single player option is unaffected by the multiplayer component’s performance, and the resources allotted to the SP game don’t suffer because of the MP.

      • ampersandrew@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Historically, some of the best multiplayer components attached to single player games were done with very few resources in a matter of weeks, like Halo and Goldeneye.

        • Moonguide@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          True, but that was before mtx became the name of the game. Nowadays when a game has a multiplayer component with no bells and whistles and just works, it’s an outlier.

          • ampersandrew@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            And now those games just get shut down with no recourse. Eventually, those companies will realize that they’re better off making a multiplayer game that doesn’t get 5 years worth of updates to chase after bazillions of dollars that never materialize.

        • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Tack Call of Duty Zombies into that list too, but Moonguide has a point. CoD: BlOps 3 was the last really good zombies experience and that was just as they were starting to turn it into an MTx nightmare.

    • aperson@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I liked how FEAR did it back in the day. The multiplayer was a separate game you could download for free and play. Then, if you liked the game, you could pay for the single player.

      • Callie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I definitely don’t mind the multiplayer being separate. I typically buy games years after their shelf life and their multiplayer is usually dead, so having that MP component be a separate download would save me space for something I can’t even play

  • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Fucking hell

    Why does everything new coming out have to be a goddamn live service?? Don’t you have a blood dragon 2 to develop Ubisoft??

  • Gamma@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    This sounds awesome, extraction shooters are a genre I’m glad is taking off

    • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Same, but I’m still eagerly waiting for someone to do the genre better then Tarkov. But so far, nothing has scratched the itch like Tarkov.

      • Gamma@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Fair! The place I’ve played it most is a VR mod called Escape from Pavlov, so it was a bit basic feature-wise but still a ton of fun

  • Computerchairgeneral@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Not the biggest fan of extraction shooters, but the permadeath mechanic sounds interesting. Although I’m not sure how common that is in this kind of game.