Love how you deleted all the bits of your original nonsense about what the commandments story says and substituted something from the other end of the Bible to prove me wrong, when I said that the commandments story doesn’t argue what you said it did. And you were claiming that someone else was moving the goalposts?!

Romans 1:20: since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made”.

Sounds to me that that’s a claim about God’s qualities rather than a logical argument for his existence. Again, I don’t think there are logical arguments about the existence of God in there, and I think you’re looking for that silly ontological argument some much later philosophers made (that God must exist because God is perfect and not existing is an imperfection or some such nonsense). I don’t think it’s in the Bible, and I don’t think philosophical arguments for the existence of God are in the Bible, because like I said hours ago, it’s an underlying assumption in the whole thing, not something presented as a logical argument, just a bunch of stories, poems and letters, some of them second or third hand, about how people perceived the events they experienced or heard of, through the perspective of their religion. The fact that you think their religion is hocum should not blind you, as a thinking person who claims an education and adherence to the evidence, to the historical existence of the real historical person Jesus, about whom those stories were written.

I admitted I might be wrong when I hadn’t checked (and I have no intention to read the whole Bible just to check if you’re wrong).

So you knowingly made an argument from ignorance?

Admitting you might be wrong when you’re not sure is the opposite of ignorance. Ignorance is refusing to learn and insisting you’re right when you’re worried you’re wrong. The stupidest things are said by people who can’t believe they might be mistaken.

For example, (and of course I might be wrong about this), I personally find it plausible that St George, Patron Saint of England, was a real historical figure who was killed in 303CE or thereabouts, but I strongly disbelieve that he fought or killed a dragon. You seem pathologically unable to emotionally and intellectually separate the existence of the person from the stories about them.