JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 10 months agoInfinite Loopprogramming.devimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up135
arrow-up135imageInfinite Loopprogramming.devJPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 10 months agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squarejubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoProject A: Has 6 different implementations of the same complex business logic. Project B: Has one implementation of the complex business logic… But it’s ALL in one function with 17 arguments and 1288 lines of code. “The toast always lands the buttered side down.”
minus-squareQuazarOmega@lemy.lollinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoProject B is just called neural network
minus-squareCanadaPlus@futurology.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoActually, I bet you could implement that in less. You should be able to legibly get several weights in one line.
minus-squareTheFerrango@lemmy.basedcount.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoOnly 1288 lines? Can I raise you a 6000+ lines stored procedure that calls to multiple different sql functions that each implements a slightly different variation of the same logic?
minus-squareMiaou@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoAre there triggers in the sql database? It’s too easy otherwise
Project A: Has 6 different implementations of the same complex business logic.
Project B: Has one implementation of the complex business logic… But it’s ALL in one function with 17 arguments and 1288 lines of code.
“The toast always lands the buttered side down.”
Project B is just called neural network
Actually, I bet you could implement that in less. You should be able to legibly get several weights in one line.
Only 1288 lines? Can I raise you a 6000+ lines stored procedure that calls to multiple different sql functions that each implements a slightly different variation of the same logic?
Are there triggers in the sql database? It’s too easy otherwise