💀💀💀

    • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      They are not old, they are economically inactive. Hmm, I can see it becoming a thing…

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is part of every tight labor market, the marginally attached come back in when the employer is willing to pay up.

    Imagine someone retired for 6 months and then a big project comes up at their old employer…they might go back, but it better be for 30% more or something.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s exactly what my grandfather did, although it was quite a bit more than 30%.

      Bit of a special case though, he legitimately really enjoyed his job and worked it so he only went into the office 3 days a week

  • grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m really conflicted about this. On the one hand, I am not defined by my contribution to the economy, the value capital owners are able to skim off my labour. Fuck off with that.

    On the other, 50-64 year olds who could afford to retire early are exactly the demographic buying into nativist anti-immigration rhetoric resulting in this, and it’s a bit funny thinking about that group getting hoisted by their own petard.

    • JoBo@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      They’re not getting hoisted by anyone’s petard. It’s not the people who can afford a comfortable retirement the liberals* have in their sights here.

      • for any confused USians, that word does not mean what you (probably) think it means