Just using fluentd to push the files into an ElasticSearch DB and using Kibana as frontend is one day of work for a kubernetes admin and it works good enough (and way better than grepping logfiles from every of the 3000 pods running in a big cluster)
And if something breaks they put the burden on you for not creating backups. Always keep it in writing that you are supposed to work on something else, otherwise you will get the problem down the line
I think the scientific causus nowadays is that the mirror test is not sufficient for cats because we don’t know if they don’t recognize themselfs or just don’t care
No. For 4K Netflix the browser needs to talk to a specific, locked down, part of your Intel (!) CPU. This only works on Edge in Windows or Safari on MacOS (it also works with the Store apps). It never works on Linux and it does not work on Chrome or Firefox.
That’s only because you use a Mac, on Windows only Edge allows 4k Netflix. It’s the integrated browsers that have the HDCP hardware features so it allows 4K
It also is very unstable when using multiple profiles. The profiles update individually, so very often you start a second profile and it updates firefox, which makes the first profile not work anymore. You don’t really notice that though, it just stops loading any websites.
Also on mobile it stops streams running in the background after some time, so when listening to something via firefox you have to actively use FF while listening, can’t leave the phone turned to standby
yeah thats why I said it only has the chance, not that it leads to good code
Meine Mutter schwärmt total oft von den Sonntagsfahrverboten die es früher gab und auch in Belgien sind die 2 Sonntage im Jahr ja ein richtiger Feiertag geworden. Autobahnfeste, Rollschuhfahren und co., meine Mutter sagt immer die Sonntage damals waren immer das Highlight der Woche weil alle so entspannt waren und die Autobahnen so viel Freizeit geboten haben.
Wie kann es sein, dass sich Privatverbraucher zur heutigen Zeit überwiegend Autos kaufen, die 10l/100km verbrauchen? Maximalverbräuche wären wirklich mehr als angebracht, wer ein Auto kaufen möchte das mehr als 6l/100km verbraucht, sollte dafür eine Ausnahmegenehmigung beantragen müssen. Wer ein Rennauto kaufen will muss beweisen können, dass er es auch braucht. Man sollte mindestens ein paar mal im Jahr damit auch nachgewiesen auf die Rennstrecke. Niemand braucht einen 600PS Audi um damit die Familie in den Urlaub zu fahren
The only thing that has the chance to prevent unmaintainable garbage code is a plethora of linting rules.
Funfact: Mozzarellasticks sind laut einem Kurzvideo das ich gesehen habe das tödlichste Lebensmittel der Welt
Of course the amount of insects drastically reduced, but for the windscreen there is another thing to take into account: Cars today are extremely aerodynamic. Even new Jeeps and the F150s are aerodynamic. Because of this, the insects are pushed away from your windscreen instead of against it, which is one of the main reasons why your windscreen isn’t full of insects anymore.
The only real exception to this is the Mercedes G-Class, but I doubt that a lot of us will ever sit in one
Edit: apparently I’m wrong: https://feddit.de/comment/8318194
Da gibt es mehrere Gründe:
At least all countries I’ve been to have blinds on the outside. Germany and Netherlands have rolling shutters like these: https://www.rollorieper.de/images/rollladen/overview_rollladen_mobile.webp
Southern and Eastern european countries tend to have little doors on the outside like these: https://www.schneider-schoenwalde.de/fileadmin/\_processed\_/3/8/csm_moosgruene-fensterlaeden_d2513c37b0.webp which are made of wood or plastic
I have never been to poland, scandinavia or the baltics, but all countries I’ve been to have one way or another to completely block light and don’t let cats scratch the curtains
European blinds solve this as well, they are made of plastic and are on the outside of the window, not inside
PgUp and PgDn are also extremely useful when scrolling through logs
no it’s the joke. In o-notation you always use the highest approximation, so o(n!²) does not exist, it’s only o(n!)
Otherwise there would never be o(1) or o(n), because o(1) would imply that the algorithm only has a single line of instructions, same for o(n)