you can’t prove this.
you can’t prove this.
the green candidate speaks out against russia. they’re not a puppet.
being wrong doesn’t make you a fascist. siding with fascist does though.
i never said everyone is fascist.
one of us is dodging facts, but its not me: i know what words mean.
Removed by mod
we are all human but we still have a word for it. you don’t seem to have a good grap of the concept of language.
Interesting you ignored the question of how that word could have meaning if it describes all countries
if all countries implemented direct democracy, does direct democracy lose its meaning?
If you’re willing to pretend different things are the same,
this is so vague it probably doesn’t even mean anything.
Goodbye
god i hope this means you found the block button
if you’re willing to vote for joe biden, knowing his policies up to this point, then you are willing to vote for fascism.
a modern nation state with a mechanized military is absolutely indistinguishable from fascism.
they will do whatever it takes to maintain the power of the state to field that military, so they will do whatever it takes to maintain the power of the state. everything else, the trappings of law and order, the facade of democratic control, the illusion of economic freedom, they will only exist so far as they are necessary to maintain state power.
under pax americana, our mutual defense treaties have relieved many states of the necessity of fielding their own military to the extent necessary to defend their state, but the mutual defense treaties make them absolutely complicit in the fascism of the states capable of defending them. in particular, the usa, but any other military power as well.
opposing the creep of outspoken politically fascist movements to seize the reigns of these technocratically fascist states is secondary, in my consideration, to the dismantling of the technocratic fascist states.
it seems that you are content to tolerate the fascist state so long as someone you can’t identify as politically fascist controls it. i am not.
oh, they are both definitely fascist.
they didn’t say they’re the same.
most people get at least some of their food for free, subsidized, or through farming, gardening, or hunting. this study only accounted for foods taht people buy. it’s misleading to claim this represents accurately how much people spend on food.
Some vegetarians spend less money on food, others don’t
why didn’t you include the name of the study?
First, it is always unclear whether the omitted-variable bias exists because the “true” model is unknown. Thus, future research may include more covariates other than the ones considered here to minimize the bias. Moreover, studies like the present study rely on consumers’ capacity to honestly report information on the food consumed. Future research may consider other methodologies that can actually observe and report all foods consumed and the cost associated with them. This way, it will also be possible to capture other personal, cultural, socio-economic, and behavioural characteristics of the consumers which are difficult to assess using the present methodology. However, data of this nature would be expensive to collect.
i refuted the one i had already seen. i’ll deal with the others later.
so why include the misleading one?
the problem is strategic voting in a fptp system. if voters would vote their values (assuming their values are anti-genocide), then it wouldn’t matter.