for a moment I though the joke is that you need 404 of them

in my understanding offset is technically the “relative index”, or how much you have to go further

why do we call standards open when they require people to pay for access to the documents? to me that does not sound open at all

didn’t google include jpeg-xl support already in developer versions of chromium, just to remove it later?

well, then just consider those giving shitty support for it as if they wouldn’t be supporting it at all

penpot?

Good bot

/s

Alias. To gr, even!

Isn’t that something that was basically taken over by corporate people?

Missed opportunity to include Portal 3

I have recently seen one, but that’s it. Fortunately my mobile client does not keep track of a history so I won’t be able to find it… to be honest it’s possible that I have seen it while browsing All from my account on another instance

In the end their name, their achievements and their reputation has been transferred, and nothing else. I feel they (the studios’ teams) have been made use of to then deceive people who trust the names.

I’m sure you’re building the best business you can.

but a video player to run through the command line on a daily drive desktop with GUI and everything?

I’m not running it from the command line, I open videos with it from my file manager, or through the Jellyfin plugin.

I mean when I’m on my desktop I just want to click on my media file and launch it right away.

Yes, that’s what I do. Of course, your desktop environment has to know that you have this MPV and it can open such and such files, but it can work like that.

I don’t know what they mean, but to me it didn’t become less great, just MPV (based players) are often better. They are more customizable (even scriptable) and better with the resource usage.

You don’t even need to cough with the right setting on. That’s just a safety feature for the uninitiated, so that they don’t submit freaked out bug reports.

Do you think this one will be there too, with tencent in the picture?

Ads are probably actually not that bad. But to me the massive stalking is unacceptable. So, uBO FTW!

Yes, or more precisely it’s DNS over HTTPS.
The S at the end stand for Secure, but technically it means that it is HTTP inside TLS. TLS encrypts the traffic, and verifies server responses to be authentic.
HTTP and HTTPS are most often used by websites, but there are many more common uses of it.

When a program - like firefox - uses DoH to resolve domain names (that is, find their corresponding IP address, they can have multiple), then instead of asking the DNS server that was configured in the operating system (often automatically set by your router’s “advisory”, though DHCP) through a clear text channel that is prone to inspection and manipulation, instead of that it asks a DNS server that communicates over HTTPS, just like webservers do.
By doing this, domain name lookups have the protection of TLS, and they look like as if you have just visited a website. It’s harder* to find out which server was that request sent to, what was the purpose of that request, and since the content of the request is encrypted, and the response is encrypted and signed just as when visiting a website, it’s harder to see as an outside observer what was being done, including what website’s IP did you look up, and it’s harder for them to modify this response.

DoH servers to be used may be set up with an IP address if that is fix and never changes, or through a domain name. If you only have the domain name of a DoH server, then you can’t contact that yet, first you have to look up it’s IP address using either an other DoH server who’s address is fix or the current one is known, or with a plain DNS server.

I think Firefox uses DoH by default in certain places