- 3 Posts
- 5 Comments
Sackeshi@lemmy.worldOPto Antiwork@lemmy.world•Would you vote for a Workers or Labor party without an official social platform only a purely leftist/socialist economic platform?1·16 days agoIt’s how at least on the federal level you convince people to unite and get sweeping economic reforms. A party wide policy of “leave it to the states” and the only non economic policy being to implement proportional representation would actually help people while allowing the state level parties to have state specific social issues
Sackeshi@lemmy.worldOPto Antiwork@lemmy.world•Would you vote for a Workers or Labor party without an official social platform only a purely leftist/socialist economic platform?4·18 days agoIt’s to make unity among the working class easier. If everyone can agree in the economics then it’s smarter to stay quiet on divisive social issues and leave ot to the elected members to vote how they see fit.
I prefer voice mail, If it’s important enough send it, if you’re not a contact and there’s no caller ID I’m not picking up, I’m not screening your call I don’t want you to know I saw the call.
If you’re a contact and I miss you send a text
Ideally the same government that implemented the removal of at will would also implement state level single payer.
Unions would be more of an outside thing where guilds would form instead to help get favorable Contracts for specific fields which would probably work better. Imagine each industry including service and retail had a “guild” that would handle contracts and decide minimums via member votes
Edit: 5 years of stability sounds amazing imo
Easy workers in say UAW use their union money to build an academy. It would slowly move from unions to guilds as the money pooling is the same