TheObviousSolution

A man after my own incompetence.

Just because things can be done quickly does not mean they should be.

Good thing you will never have to worry about that!

A. Another comment (and my own observations - not even in the US, so no idiocracy factor either) prove otherwise. They claim it’s to deal with bodily fluids (I guess sweat doesn’t count for them). B. Not a shared reality. Your market, your choices I guess, but even amazon.com (US market) disagrees on the prices you are claiming.

I don’t know if you have another definition of cheap, or just live in a different worse off market.

There’s basically two sorts of people: the one’s willing to overlook the aesthetics and the one’s who aren’t. There’s a reason hospital staff wear them. They are not designed to look good, they are designed to let the humidity from your sweat evaporate instead of letting it accumulate into a damp breeding ground ripe for a host of foot conditions. For some people it will matter more than others.

There’s plenty of Crocs designs that don’t look ugly, but I hope they continue to be unpopular as that keeps them cheap. It’s risky to switch to other brands with this sort of design, Crocs got it right.

I’ll tuck that fact right beside the Haavara Agreement with the Nazis. Neocolonialism gonna neocolonize.

You just proved you haven’t, but you are going to stick to your stereotypes regardless of what I tell you. You are going to reply to this comment, but don’t expect a reply back.

You fail to understand the difference between correlation and causation. That they have wealth and power is different from how it is used. Having said that, yeah, my definition is sort of different because I also consider the social bubble aspect that they live in (hence my Trump comment).

Let me ask you, what happens when your revolution is successful, and it is you that has wealth and power. It doesn’t take a lot of imagination, the CCP is sort of this.

It all depends on the definition of class, and it is such an arbitrary one. What I meant was that if your definition is arbitrary enough, it tends to include a lot of false positives. There are a number of rich people who have said that they should be taxed more and have not shown any indication of contradicting themselves, for example.

They aren’t using “class”, there is no such thing as “class”, Trump is the biggest example of it - he has none, it’s just a big scam to him. They are using wealth and power, but correlation does not imply causation, no matter how big that correlation may be.

Just seems to me you are redefining the middle class into the working class and are focusing on making the distinction be based on belonging to some arbitrary class. I don’t even think the psychopaths we are referring to really care about belonging to anything if they can get ahead.

You can mobilize people, but if you are excluding people that could be included or trying to address what’s actually an arbitrary definition, don’t forget, there are psychopaths interested in taking you for a ride.

It’s psychopaths succeeding for being psychopaths and not because they involve in some arbitrary concept of a class.

The meme is literally about people are traditionally labelled different classes fighting against themselves.

So grass routes mobilisation/organisation seems required at this point, otherwise, the status quo continues on.

And if successful, then becomes the system, including the legal system, and then the same flaws appear. The revolutions that have been most successful kept in mind the laws and legislation that needed to be changed or enforced. Otherwise, it’s just regime change insert number here.

What an asshole.

Some people want a class war because it’s an easy excuse and par for the course for a lot of the ideologies that have seeded Lemmy. Colonialism and neocolonialism have always relied on class wars to keep people fighting against each other, and unfortunately to some extent this can never be fixed because some people fall into that trap so easily.

Focusing on those entities that have excessive wealth and actively spend it to lobby against our interests while paying only for a fraction what we pay for our share can be handled through laws and legislation, no class warfare needed.