In most cases it really has less to do with the companies or HR and more to do with their insurance rates. Remember, the absolute last thing an insurance company wants to do is pay out, so if it can find an out or a way to increase the premiums, it will. I mean, sure there might be some uptight HR or other upper level suit with a stick up their ass at some companies, but everything usually has to do with money.

Then you get Texas. We’ve got a law that just went into effect that basically takes away huge swaths of law making powers from the cities. They have made no attempt to hide that it was entirely for the benefit of businesses at the expense of locals and their desires.

While I am very pro-minimum wage, it does need to be more regionally based than nationally. The minimum required to get by in LA, New York, and so forth is going to be different than some podunk middle of no where towns in rural America.

Meanwhile the cost of living has increased 2077% in 85 years.

Her net worth is north of $1.5 million. She doesn’t need the work to eat.

Thank you. That put it in better perspective.

Anytime a corporation says something like this what they’re really saying is “It would inconvenience our executives and shareholders.”

Goes to show how effective the anti-union rhetoric has been. Fucking shame. Unions built modern America.

Tell me you’re a shill without telling me you’re a shill.

How shitty her reputation is?