And God created Adam

Google “ferengi rule 34”

I mean, I don’t buy fast food anyway. Seems like they have in fact shifted away from, institutionally, supporting anti-LGBT groups, although private support continues. So technically I was correct, but functionally just seems like corporate whitewashing.

Do they? I thought I heard that they did a u-turn on that a few years back.

Twist: those are psych researchers, and he is in the experimental group.

The theory I’ve read is that lots of people are into a bit of the taboo/forbidden partner aspect of an attraction they have toward a real person in their life: their neighbor, platonic friend, co-worker, etc. But most of these connections don’t really feel all that taboo when it’s someone else, so the “step-” angle is just a generic stand in that carries the forbidden aspect without going too far.

It could be ambiguous to a general audience. A Chevron logo would’ve been more elegant

Because of the “every time”. Only sith deal in absolutes.

Not necessarily, depends on the groceries. If you shop irresponsibly, you can spend just as much if not more on groceries.

The low 000s are all generally pretty meta subjects, how we interact with and organize knowledge in general. Journalism and library science deal with reporting and classifying information, computers and programming deal with processing generic data, unexplained phenomena deals with things that can’t be assigned to a specific subject by their very nature.

Witchcraft, Feng Shui, and Tarot are all generally found in 133 (Parapsychology and Occultism), although I could imagine particularly high-level books to be sorted into 003 (Systems), since they are supposed to be comprehensive systems.

Books about computer hardware would be next to electronics. Computer science is where it is because it’s a more abstract topic about general information processing. If anything, I’d argue that fundamental mathematics belongs in the 000s with it.

Actually, I don’t really like the progress flag and think it contributes to division. The original rainbow flag is perfect: sexuality and gender expression are a broad spectrum, the stripes don’t represent individual groups, the whole rainbow represents all groups.

The progress flag adds symbols for specific groups which were already included in the rainbow. Once you start singling groups out piecemeal, you enter an endless spiral of having to individually acknowledge every group, and there’s always another subdivision being left out.

I also like the reclamation of the word “queer” and think it’s a far more unifying label than LGBTQIA+, for the same reason.

It’s fine to have focused actions, but unified movements are better.

Same basic concept, but not the origin of the term. It’s a common misconception.

“Tankie” originates with Soviets using tanks to stop rebellion in Hungary, and refers to those who condone using authoritarian violence to suppress dissidents. They frequently overlap, but they’re distinct concepts.

Oh, this is good information to have.

I read someone saying the other day, that Hallmark movies make a lot of sense if you think of small town empty-nest mothers as their main demographic.

Edit: I found the comment, couldn’t find the article they’re talking about though.

Still updating, albeit slowly

Be seeing you

You expect me to believe a can shaped this glass?

Isn’t the whole point in the game that Oak just invented it and needs you to fill it up?

This was the first place my mind went when I found out about 6 7