amorpheus

Eh, it’s funny even if it’s inaccurate.

Congress…

Telemetry is not malware, as much as you may despise both of them. Words mean things.

Would you think that makes sense if you were designing this feature?

But there’s still a good and a bad way to make those movies. I usually find RT a good indicator if a movie I’m interested in will be worth watching. Especially looking at both scores. The critic score is a good indicator if the movie is competently made, the user score shows if people felt entertained. If it’s 50% critics and 80% user it’s one of those that won’t get Oscars but should be fun to watch once. If it’s 70% critic and 40% user it’s that the director tried something unconventional and it didn’t click with people. Etc.

Who needs to save characters that much?

Do you realize how old assembly language is?

It predates hard disks by ten years and coincided with the invention of the transistor.

That’s the point everyone making these memes is missing. If they actually had nukes already, none of this would be happening.

This offensive is supposed to make sure they don’t develop nuclear weapons, whether the reasoning is fabricated or not.

Additionally, the batter is made up of their eggs.

Per mole?

The observed staying power is somehow relative to how important it is to you personally.

Literally threw him through some walls. Probably couldn’t be sure his boss would survive.

That’s the thing, I don’t want to invest that time. If I’m looking at the rating of a movie, I’m already interested, I just need to know if I’m likely to enjoy it or not. Whether it’s rated 5.8, 6.1 or 6.4 doesn’t do anything for me at that point, whereas the RT score answers that question perfectly.

I find Rotten Tomatoes much more useful. Knowing that 90% of critics gave a favorable review is infinitely more helpful for my decision to watch a movie than its IMDB score.

Resistance is futile.

Moz art

Doesn’t look like it.