Well Google said otherwise when they removed support for it: https://storage.googleapis.com/avif-comparison/index.html

However I’m not sure how trustworty their own statistic is.

On the other hand Mozilla’s PoV:

neutral - JPEG-XL includes features and performance that might differentiate it from other formats, but the benefits it provides are not significant enough on their own to justify the cost of adding another C++ image decoder to browsers. A memory-safe decoder would reduce these costs considerably, and we are open to shipping one that meets our requirements.

https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/

So AV1 is clearly the winner here, also because it can be used for videos and not just images.

But they were, all of them, deceived

For another format was made.

Invalid since 2023: https://caniuse.com/push-api

Not all heroes wear capes

Kind of unrelated: But what if the current year is a leap year?

deleted by creator

You just guessed my job lol

And don’t want to upgrade/switch because it is too expensive

Oh boy, you better have no employees or Oracle will make you pay for their existence:

https://www.oracle.com/in/a/ocom/docs/corporate/pricing/java-se-subscription-pricelist-5028356.pdf

Although I couldn’t find any source about the Falklands, the same definetly happend in New Zealand:

• https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/n11734/pdf/04_howitt.pdf
• https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21501-boiled-to-death-penguins-are-back-from-the-brink/

So I think it’s very likely that it also happend at the opposite side of Antarctica.

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/moth-lamp

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_airship_accidents

Apart from the 80% of the entries that are basically “Crashed during bad weather” - my personal highlights:

… breaks loose from its mooring during a storm and is blown over the English Channel; after sightings in Wales and Ireland and a brief touchdown in Belfast, the airship was blown out over the Atlantic Ocean and is never seen again.

Zeppelin LZ 8 Deutschland II (brand new) is caught by a wind gust while being walked out of its hangar and damaged beyond repair after it smashes on the roof of the hangar.

… the airship, weighed down with gold and burgundy paint, reached 600 feet altitude before beginning an unplanned right descending turn, making a “controlled descent” into a garbage dump, impaling the blimp on a pine tree, coming down just a quarter-mile from the site of the Hindenburg’s 1937 demise.

… suffers an intentional mid-air collision with a radio-controlled airplane.

I did this because it looked better this way… and it was totally 100% intentional :D

What do you mean? An african or european owl?

Is this a crosspost from https://lemmy.world/post/29709088 ?

That GitHub comment makes my brain hurt and gives me Microsoft community forum advisor (run ChEcKDiSK tO mAYbe fIX tHe ProBLem) and “leave the multi-billion dollar company alone” vibes.

Also it’s not a single line - when looking at the source file - and a complete section instead.

GitHub Copilot, as used in the documentation here, is free and integrated into the IDE.

1. It’s inside the dotnet Docs. dotnet has nothing to do with an IDE. You can code/run dotnet code in any editor or terminal if you like.
2. This person assumes that Visual Studio is the only IDE for dotnet. Looks like they never heard of Rider or VS Code or anything else.

I do not think that you can call it an ad if it is for a free tool.

WTF is he defining as an ad? “Advertising is the practice and techniques employed to bring attention to a product or service”. The whole section is bascially “Hey you can use Copilot to do this” - that’s an ad right there.

Even if you interpret this as encouraging users to pay

Makes no sense. Does this person think ad = you have to pay for it???

it is hardly the first time that dotnet documentation guides users towards paid Microsoft products: are we going to start complaining about all pages with references to Azure next?

1. A deployment target is not the same as “AI”
2. If a page/section is not named like “How to deploy example app to Azure” then it shouldn’t contain any reference to Azure. And yes you should complain about such stuff if it exists.

The only part of this I actually object to is that I don’t think that what essentially amounts to ‘prompt an LLM’ belongs in documentation, although at the very least the page does disclose that the output may be erroneous.

That’s basically what the whole issue is about. WTF are you even talking about then? Just shut up and give an upvote.

Overall a totally useless comment.

Diese Kommentarsektion ist nun Eigentum der BRD.

Not sure if you read this blog post: https://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2025/04/unified-pycharm/

Rest assured – our commitment to open-source development remains as strong as ever. The Community Edition codebase will stay public on GitHub, and we’ll continue to maintain and update it. We’ll also provide an easy way to build PyCharm from source via GitHub Actions.

PyCharm is - like all JetBrains IDEs - based on intellij-community and the “Pro” stuff just some fancy pre-installed plugin that requires a license.

Alternatively, you may choose to manually switch to the new PyCharm immediately and keep using everything you have now for free, plus the support for Jupyter notebooks.

So all community functionallities will also be available in the unified edition for free.

Also the Pro license - which you can also get 4 free in like 10 different ways - pricing is extremely fair: A license costs $100-60 for an individual, which is cheaper than most streaming subscriptions…