9 downvotes

If we exclude this guy, it will be 8.

I already use the former to describe the sound unambiguously.

Also, we need ɨ.

ɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨɨ that’s the sound I make inbetween “no reaction” and laughing

Yes, you are on .ml, comrade. Only bad words are disallowed.

-20 Social Credit

Do not question our leader again.

(first place already finished)

I require context.

So if a game is only made by one person, it’s indie?

The first two examples are clearly made by multiple people. They just haven’t registered a company. I good rule I found, not for games but just in general, is that if it’s a registered organization it’s probably not as good as you think it is otherwise.

Only counting (intended) exclusives, uhh…

osu!stream…

Uhhhhhhhhhhhh…

Mekorama.

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh…

That’s also a really shitty definition since Valve and Nintendo are publishing themselves too. If you argue “well they are their own publisher” then I counter with “well anyone uploading to itch.io will have itch.io as their publisher”.

Here’s one definition. If you go to the Steam page for Deltarune, it says “tobyfox” as developer, that’s a (nick)name. OneShot (2016) says “Future Cat LLC” but that seems to be made up since Steam asks for “company name”. Celeste’s “Maddy Makes Games Inc.” seems real, however. Therefore, Celeste isn’t indie.

I did say “is still indie”.

Depends on how you define indie. By my definition, Deltarune is still indie but made by a quintillionaire so like, meh. Celeste was indie when it was just a fantasy console bs thing.

jokes on you, I also use MUSL/centre-left and BSD/anarchism

EDIT: The BSDs aren’t anarchist since someone de facto decides what gets in and what doesn’t. The closest “anarchist” software project I can think of is TCC as of recently, they allow contributions like a wiki.

Transcript could be AI

Don’t accidentally use the term without definition in a group that doesn’t know it yet lol

Yes, a few times. I have exactly 60 “.kdenlive” files in my “videos” dir. That editor itself sucks, but seems your does harder.

Can’t demo much as most of these are aimed at very niche communities (ranging from 1k people to 4 person groupchat with only 1 person who cares), and some are also a bit problematic in content. As you could have guessed, it’s meme stuff, so quite image heavy.

            DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
                    Version 2, December 2004

 Copyright (C) 2004 Sam Hocevar <sam@hocevar.net>

 Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified
 copies of this license document, and changing it is allowed as long
 as the name is changed.

            DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
   TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION

  0. You just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO.

Now, what are you defining as “functionality”?

AVIF has a lossless mode. Although nobody cares for it, the slightly lossy is fine. It’s adjustable just like JPEG is adjustable.

Also, it’s really annoying to convert since ffmpeg can’t do it yet, but the two major browsers support AV1 video, with alpha, in a .avif that you can shove into an <img> tag. It’s basically just a video. But animated. And transparent. It also works on Discord web now (but not mobile). AND you can set repetition count, if you really want. Can’t show the masterpiece I’ve made before with that since it would be way out of topic, although here’s an HD example with the animation from here:

Ironically, the creators of the damn browser didn’t know that it’s possible and used a .webm. Well, the bourgeoisie division of the organization that makes the browser, of course. The @redhat.com emails, lol. Also, the metadata for the .webm says “ezgif”. Oh welp. And yes, the greenscreen leaking at the edges was already there.

Command (bourne shell): ffmpeg -c:v libvpx-vp9 -i pop-up-1480.webm -strict -1 -f yuv4mpegpipe -pix_fmt yuva444p - | avifenc --stdin pop-up-1480.avif (-c:v needed to get ffmpeg to read the transparency).

File size:

.webm: 540KiB
.avif: 486KiB
.gif: 6.2MiB

GIF command used for comparison: gifski pop-up-1480.webm -H 832 -r 33.3333333333333333333333 -Q 100 --extra -o pop-up-1480.gif, 100% to match original quality somewhat

Translation: your video editor sucks.

Don’t forget to add role="none" for accessibility.

Wait until you find out that people made and still make sites that load on both IE and Netscape.