fluffy_cloud

You people draw the longest conclusions from the scantest evidence.

My white German Shepherd tries to herd us all into bed at night. She snaps she growls she barks. She has very strong opinions about what the pack should be doing when the sun goes down. She’s very sweet but she’s also very pushy.

Yeah I get that. It needs to provide the evidence too but ya.

My point was that such (explanation + evidence) would be provided for every instance of banning. That was not made explicit in your post and that’s why I brought it up.

But what of my idea for providing a modicum of justicely due process and transparency? The document justifying the ban. That was my point.

I’m sure that if we picked through your mind we would find something to be deeply offended by too. But we lack ESP. So it’s the artists that get exposed to judgment while the rest of us basically hide it.

This design of this forum (subcontracted despotism or whatever) makes censorship very easy. And modern society is so often a race to who can get offended first. So to avoid shenanigans, any banned artist should have an associated document (a pinned post? Wiki entry?) explaining why that artist is banned, with substantiating evidence, for future reference.

It isn’t really much of a joke. I mean no twist, no arc. Just stumbled along.

Good graphics tho.