lemmyvore

Isn’t it fourth?

Bayesian filters are statistical, they have nothing to do with machine learning.

You should consider if you really want to integrate your application super tightly with the HTTP protocol.

Will it always be used exclusively over a REST-ful HTTP API that you control, and it has exactly one hop to the client, or passes through hops that can be trusted to never alter the HTTP metadata significantly? In that case you can afford to make HTTP codes semantically relevant for your app.

But maybe you need to pass data through multiple different types of layers and different mechanisms (socket protocols, pub-sub, file storage etc.) In that case you want all your semantics to be independent from any form of transport.

It’s a perfectly fine way of doing things as long as it’s consistent and the spec is clear.

HTTP is a transport layer. You don’t have to use its codes for your application layer. It’s often done that way but it’s not the only way.

In the example above the transport layer is saying “OK I’ve delivered your output” which is technically correct. It’s not concerned with logical errors inside what it was transporting, just with the delivery itself.

If any client app is blindly converting body to JSON without checking (at the very least) content type and size, they deserve what they get.

If you want to make it part of your API spec to always return JSON that’s one thing, but don’t do it to make up for poorly written clients. There’s no end of ways in which clients can fail. Sticking to a clear spec is the only way to preserve your sanity.

But denormalized databases are not a new thing. There are engines that build on it on purpose in order to be more efficient, like Cassandra. Most data warehousing engines use this “trick”. And of course you can do it with a regular RDBMS too.

To some extent all software is disposable. Some places take it to a more ridiculous level than others. If they have money to burn just make sure as much of it as possible ends up in your pocket.

Depends on who wins the election. Trump would come out with anti-union legislation so the large studios might decide to hold out for that.

Who were they talking to.

I blame whoever had their chat open at 1am.

This whole debacle is a festival of stupidity:

• It’s a personal project that taxes the sole maintainer disproportionately.
• Millions of idiots use it blindly and end up building elaborate software on it. https://xkcd.com/2347/
• I’ll bet you 99.99% of those idiots use it only for ip.isPrivate(), which you can write yourself in 5 minutes.
• The CVE is a non-issue (who the fuck would call a function that takes string notation with hex numbers?)
• Appealing and reverting or downgrading CVEs is super complicated.

At this point the maintainer is fucked no matter what they do, so archiving the project and telling everybody to fuck off right back was really the only sane thing to do.

Then fork it and do that.

These projects are structured as hobbyist projects and get whatever time the maintainer can spare. I have projects like that, they’re useful, but I’m not gonna prioritize them over… anything else, come to think of it.

The fact so many people treat a hobbyist project with one maintainer as critical infrastructure is insane, but that’s on them. Everybody likes free software, nobody likes to help or pay the maintainer.

Clearly it wasn’t maintained.

Lol. It’s an IP library. IP classifications haven’t changed. What could he possibly update?

He’s not suggesting to replace timestamps (nor database sequences). They’re unique identifiers, and they happen to include a timestamp.

If you were 100% specific you would be effectively writing the code yourself. But you don’t want that, so you’re not 100% specific, so it makes up the difference. The result will include an unspecified percentage of code that does not fit what you wanted.

It’s like code Yahtzee, you keep re-rolling this dice and that dice but never quite manage to get the exact combination you need.

There’s an old saying about computers, they don’t do what you want them to do, they do what you tell them to do. They can’t do what you don’t tell them to do.

Oh, God, he’s trying to use pointers again. He can never get them right. And they say I’m supposed to chase my tail…

SO gives you very specific, small examples. GenAI will happily generate entire projects, test suites etc. It’s much easier to get caught into the fantasy that the latter creates.

You can download past versions of OpenJDK going back to 7 from the link I gave above.

On Google I get the link to the download page as 3rd result, and on DuckDuckGo is the first result.

There might also be some confusion related to the fact openjdk.org only called its builds “openjdk” for version 8 and for versions 11+. Versions 7, 9 and 10 were just called “JDK” so technically there’s no such thing as “openjdk 10”.

60M total but divided among 40 counties makes 1.5M variations per county and the capital city (which is its own county, like Berlin) went over that.

I looked it up and Bucharest actually has only a 1.7M population so… I think it’s understandable that nobody expected an almost 1:1 person-to-car ratio. Exactly why and how they reached that crazy ratio I have no idea. 😆

Told you it’s a crazy rabbit hole.

Yeah this is pretty much non-news at this point. The last unencumbered versions of JDK and JRE from Oracle went out in 2019, that’s 5 years ago, and they’re still allowing a grace period of another 6 months.

I mean don’t get me wrong, Oracle sucks and the way they go about licensing is shit, but at this point come on. If a company hasn’t bothered to get rid of Oracle’s version of Java for the last 6 years maybe they want to get shafted? I don’t kink-shame.