• 0 Posts
  • 3 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle

  • scarabic@lemmy.worldtoAntiwork@lemmy.worldWe don't have the money
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I decided to look up some numbers and do some math.

    So the CEO earns 362x the average employee at GM. Basically if they took the CEO’s pay and redidsteubuted it, they could double the pay of 362 lucky workers at GM. Or take twice as many workers as that and increase their pay by 50%.

    But how many workers are there and how far will this CEO’s pay go?

    GM has 167,000 employees. Collectively, their pay totals 167,000x the salary of the average employee. Very basic.

    Now let’s add the CEO’s pay to that sum: we are now up to a sum of money equal to 167,362x the average salary.

    And if we distribute that amongst all the employees, that’s:

    167,362/167,000

    Get out your calculator and you’ll see that this would fund a two-tenths of one percent raise for all employees. That’s 0.002%

    The pay is very unfair. But we should be realistic that the CEO is one person and their fat salary doesn’t actually go very far in terms of worker raises.

    Let’s do the math in reverse: to give all GM employees just a 2% raise would cost 9.2x the CEO’s salary. And the workers want a 40% raise over 4 years.

    I hope they get it. I believe that money is there and currently going to the entire executive layer, the board, and shareholders. But when anyone tries to oversimplify and it make it all about the CEO’s salary, I cringe a bit because it really isn’t that meaningful a sum of money, unfair as it may be.

    We should be looking at profit or better EBITDA and showing how easily it could be used to raise worker pay.