• CriticalThought@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago
    1. Claim to be anti-genocide,
    2. Act in a way that increase genocide,
    3. Accuse others of being pro-genocide,
    4. Revel in moral superiority

    chef’s kiss

    • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Now you’re getting it. A genuine moment of self reflection on Lemmy.

      1 claims to be anti-genocide.

      2 votes for a pro-genocide party.

      3 “war is peace” any vote for non-genocide is actually a vote for pro-genocide Orwellian nonsense.

      4 posits purity test they cant pass themselves.

      You summarised them perfectly.

        • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          “I really wish people would stop judging me for being part of the ‘Pro-Genocide Club’ [actual consequences of my (In)action], I’M not pro-genocide! [My intention were pure]”

          • CriticalThought@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            Of course! Increasing genocide is of little consequence compared with suffering people’s judgment. Glad we share priorities

            • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 days ago

              I don’t know what to tell you if you can’t see the brazen hypocrisy.

              Here’s my entire premise: if you’re going to be setting purity checks, make sure you pass them first. That’s it, you can try distract with “others fail it worse” all you want, but it’s just a distraction. I’ll try keep you on track though:

              Pug chose both to support genocide and be judged for their failure of attempt at moral superiority. Stop defending them, you’re only making Pug look worse.

              • CriticalThought@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                22 days ago

                Interesting. Genuinely, thanks for your reply— I’m beginning to think there’s been some sort of misunderstanding (likely on my part). I definitely was not defending Pug’s comment…

                • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  22 days ago

                  Nah, I’m a terrible communicator at the best of times. Worse this is a heated topic where revelations come after the fact if at all.