• Neato@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    1 year ago

    We can’t feasibly stop automation, nor should we. We SHOULD be taking the profits back from billionaires that they’ve stolen since time immemorial. Automation means less work overall. But we need to ensure the workers actually benefit from that.

    • DasRubberDuck@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      94
      ·
      1 year ago

      Self checkout is not automation. It’s making the customer do the work.

      Automation would be: Stick an RFID-tag to all your items, make me check in with my phone at the entrance. Automatically “scan” all the items when my cart and my phone leave the store at the same time. Bill me.

      • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        As the customer you’re already taking stuff out of your cart and putting it on the counter. Maybe automation isn’t the right word, but it’s certainly more efficient than having a human clerk. It removes a bottleneck.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          But it’s not a bottleneck. It’s the opposite. An experienced human checker will tap in the code for oranges way before you find it in their stupid menu.

          • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It is a bottleneck, because the experienced human checker is only entering orange codes for one person at a time. There could be ten people all checking themselves out simultaneously. Even if one or two get slowed down by a menu, it’s still a net decrease in average time spent at checkout.

          • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            True, but isn’t that an implementation issue that can be fixed, rather than an inherent issue with the concept?

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those Amazon just walk out stores like you’re describing are extremely expensive to setup though. Even a spall space requires tons of cameras and sensors, all items to be placed on shelves a certain way, lots of networking backend, etc. Most business are unable to do so right now and I’d say most buildings can’t accommodate it. My work looked into putting one of those in one of our spaces as a test and the cost/work to make it happen in even a small area of our business wasn’t worth it

        • DasRubberDuck@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So it will take more time until the tech is cheaper. Or, hear me out, this one is crazy: We employ cashiers!

      • Danc4498@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I went to a gas station that had this… it was kind of incredible. Put like 10 items on a sensor and it recognized all of them. Then put them in a bag.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think in terms is control, more people feel as though they can stop/protest automation more than they can take profits back. I think that was the luddite mentality? I speculate, it’s been a while since i learned it in school.