• deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    It’s shitty user experience when forced to dig out my phone to authenticate myself to a site I barely give half a shit about.

    Like I wouldn’t even have an account if it wasn’t forced, and now you assholes want my phone too?

    • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I think you’re describing SMS passcode, totp or other such factors.

      Passcode doesn’t require phone necessarily, but you can use it too

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        A lot of the stuff that has implemented passkeys so far are on mobile. And I mean the apps serving them out, not things you authenticate to.

        • 4am@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          BitWarden has a desktop extension and it also handles 2FA. No reason to be using a password, which is way less secure and can be extracted from a website DB via a hack.

            • perfectly_boiled_pizza@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              In practice, yes. IF IMPLEMENTED PROPERLY it would be extremely unlikely for an attacker to get in.

              For example with a proper implementation of TOTP it would require an attacker to guess the correct number between 0 and 999999 in less than half a minute. Most services make you wait a little bit (often less than humans notice) between attempts and don’t allow infinite attempts, so an attacker would have to be unimaginably lucky.

              There are sadly lots of huge companies that DON’T IMPLEMENT 2FA PROPERLY. Sony Entertainment (account for PlayStation) for example. So a unique and long password is still important.

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Security for who exactly?

        If I don’t even want an account, it’s the “security” of the sites ad targeting data that IDGAF.