• Molecular0079@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let’s be real. You don’t HAVE to buy the loot boxes lmao. It’s not like they make you any better as a player.

      • Voyajer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        CS skins are practically pay to lose thinking about it. They make you stand out against the map more.

        • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          …so is gaming in general. What’s your point?

          My point is that they’re just cosmetic, unlike gacha games or other free to play games where you’re FORCED to buy loot boxes to unlock good weapons and items.

          A casino REQUIRES you to spend money in order to participate. CS2 does not. Big difference.

            • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s how it works on most games

              Not really. A bunch of F2P games have lootboxes that give you a chance at better weapons / characters early on instead of going through a long grind. The set of CS weapons is the same and does not change.

              The community gets upset when it becomes pay-to-win. I wouldn’t consider CS to be pay-to-win though so I find the casino comparison a bit inaccurate.

                • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But I never argued it was

                  You’re the one who brought up the idea that the game is a casino. A casino is pay-to-win, because you literally have to pay money to participate and having more money gives you advantages.

                  This is not what CS is. You don’t have to pay money to participate and there are no upgrades weapons or characters as a result of paying more money.

          • ampersandrew@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I haven’t checked in on Counter-Strike in a long time, but we can and should call out shitty business practices designed to exploit gambling addiction to make you play when you don’t want to. I’m not equipped to assess whether CS is designed that way, but gaming in general is not predatory and addicting in this way.

            • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              assess whether CS is designed that way

              It isn’t. There’s no grind to get better weapons so that you can remain competitive with other players and no paid lootboxes that give you an early advantage. You start out with the standard set of weapons just like any other player and that never changes. The only addicting thing about the boxes in CS2 is that they look cool but I’d say that that’s more on the player to decide whether they want it or not.

              It’s like saying providing the ability to paint your car is an addicting business practice, which I don’t really buy. This is not the same as pay-to-win and the distinction should be made here.

              • ampersandrew@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You get no advantage from the battle passes in Street Fighter 6 either, but they’re still designed in such a way to keep you chasing the rewards. It can be scummy without being pay to win. But again, I don’t know what hooks CS2 has. Last I played CS:GO was when it was $15 and had no microtransactions.

                • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But because they have no impact on the gameplay, the onus is entirely on the player whether they want it or not. At this point you’re basically saying that they made the battlepasses and lootboxes interesting and therefore they’re bad

                  • ampersandrew@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    No, I’m saying I’ve seen people who keep playing games with this kind of battle pass, loot box, or other reward system when they clearly stopped enjoying the game, the same way any addict keeps doing something they know is harmful to themselves. Systems like these (and again, I have no idea what kind CS2 implements, but it’s a modern online live service game, so it’s probably in the ballpark) just want you to be a body in the online queue so that other players have someone to play with, and they chase that goal through nefarious means.

                    But because they have no impact on the gameplay, the onus is entirely on the player whether they want it or not

                    Does a problem gambler keep gambling because they want to, or because they can’t will themselves to stop?

    • aluminium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same is true for many other games that get shit for their Microtransactions. But Valve is on the “good guy” site, so rules don’t apply the same.