• money_loo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      Naw it’s a sweet love story with a standard loss ending.

      Rose’s motivations are primarily driven by her desire for freedom and independence. She feels trapped by her wealthy but oppressive family and her engagement to the controlling and wealthy Caledon.

      She’s looking for a way to escape her life and find her own identity. This leads her to a deep emotional connection with Jack. Her motivations are centered on breaking free from the constraints of her upper-class background and pursuing a life of her own choosing, which ultimately culminates in her decisions and actions throughout the film. He represents everything she’s yearned for.

      Plus he’s really hot, so that helps.

        • money_loo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, yeah. She was still a woman in an oppressively ordered patriarchy. Things have gotten a lot better since then.

          • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            True.

            That said, on that specific night, women were lucky the patriarchy was still in place, as ladies first chivalry, based on the idea that women were objects/property to be cared for rather than individuals who could/should fend for themselves, still applied and well over twice as many women were given seats on lifeboats as men, which would be seen as really patronizing today.

            Everything has a cost, even equality.

            • ivanafterall@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              As a man, I would have fought tooth and nail for a seat, but not out of selfishness.

              “PLEASE UNDERSTAND I’M DOING THIS FOR THE CAUSE OF WOMEN’S EQUALITY!!!”

            • money_loo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              For sure.

              It’s just once they got back home they still weren’t allowed to vote, grow professional careers, get equal access to higher education, own their own property while with a man because of coverture laws, be allowed to play in athletic sports or form leagues, hold any real position of political power, get a divorce easily to escape abusive relationships, allowed to be legally raped by their spouses as much as he wanted while having zero reproductive rights, etc.

              Just some give and take for that one day for some unlucky dudes, as you put it.

              • funkajunk@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Those dudes weren’t just “unlucky”, they fucking died. Stop focusing on genetalia and look at humanity.

                • money_loo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  …it was a tongue-in-cheek reply to the dismissive retort of the person I was responding to…the tone of which was meant to convey the ridiculousness of the statement, which they heavily edited to be far less sexist, to their credit.

                  Also how would you like me to not recognize the disparity imparted by their “genitals” in a comment discussing how the people with openings for genitals were allowed special treatment at this time, and less so at later times. It’s literally the entire context.

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How dare you combat my dismissive humor with well-said, thoughtful arguments!

        I’m gonna upvote your comment, but while I do, I’m gonna be thinking about the words you said and how I’ve also allowed a misogynistic bias cause me to overlook Rose as the three-dimensional character that she is and it’s all your fault!

    • ivanafterall@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      She has a very Egyptian view of the afterlife.

      “Maybe this’ll reach him way down there. Least I can do.”

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    One’s interpretation of this relationship might make for a good liberal/socialist Voight-Kampff test.

    • ivanafterall@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean…had he survived, he wouldn’t have even had a home to return to, so…wasn’t it for the best, really?

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s OK, the guy was a time traveler. If he survived than it would have caused a huge paradox in the space-time continuum.

    • lugal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s an older version of her soon to be born grandson. If he would be alive during his birth, it would be the grandson paradox