I noticed in the last few days, at least two very active posters got banned:

They are probably new people here trying out the fediverse because a friend recommended it to them, seeing that it’s lal not-so-active as they’re used from other sites, trying to populate it with content, and getting banned for it.

As far as i can see, they didn’t post highly-controversial stuff or sth. Just random and sometimes slightly-critical-of-society (but not very critical of society) comics, just as good comics should do IMO. I don’t see why they got banned?

This is not how the fediverse becomes popular among the population. This is how to convey an elitist look of “being sceptical towards new users”.

  • nocturne@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    There has been a spate of new users rapid fire posting in here and then deleting their accounts.

          • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            If 90% of the interaction comes in the first day and they leave it up that long, then they’ve basically achieved whatever goal they have. Even if the only goal is evading a ban.

          • OpenStars@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            PieFed now allows reading deleted posts, if you have the URL. Example

            Though its more for Q&As where if requested the Q would be deleted by the person who offered it while the As would remain visible by those who offered them.

            I also am absolutely in love with how it doesn’t show just a blank page if you try to access the URL, and instead says the very helpful and informative:

            The author of this post has been banned/deleted so they might not see your reply.

            Damn I love PieFed!

      • GrantUsEyes@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve been trying to make sense of their mo, and this could be it. I’ve resorted to not interact ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • TheV2@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      In that case I have a few doubts:

      1. Why is the given ban reason for these accounts “bot”, when that doesn’t describe the actual issue here, and why isn’t there a clear transparent explanation how these accounts were identified as part of this self-destruction scheme?
      2. What exactly is the issue with self-destructing accounts other than losing the comments, discussions, etc. associated with the posts? Because if that’s the only thing, I don’t see the severity.
      • Iced Raktajino@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        What exactly is the issue with self-destructing accounts other than losing the comments, discussions, etc. associated with the posts? Because if that’s the only thing, I don’t see the severity.

        It’s unfair to anyone and everyone who participates. It’s a PITA to save a post to have it just disappear later. Or remember a post and want to go back to it only to find it self-nuked. Yeah, some stuff may get modded but at least there’s a usually correct and valid reason attached. The people doing this and self-destructing are basically unmarked spambots. I fucking hate bots.

        The disposable troll account elsewhere in the comments here said “Content is king” which is the only thing in their statement I agree with. Well, when that content is ephemeral, then it’s not really “content”.

        • TheV2@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          I can see the issue with spam-bots, regardless of the self-nuking, and how especially this community is targeted. But I wouldn’t consider the accounts marked in this post as spam-bots at all.

          If this community or instance considers a couple of posts a day, perhaps specifically from new users, spamming, then as a user I’d expect that rule to be written before actions are taken.

          In general, I’m not disputing the actions of the mods and I hate to be the guy who expects something from people who contribute to this platform in their free-time, but for these kind of bans based on suspicions and patterns, I just wish there would at least be more transparent communication.

        • Sergio@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          when that content is ephemeral, then it’s not really “content”.

          I personally agree, but I can see how others might not. I never used 4chan, but wasn’t it like that? People used temporary names, and content was deleted after a short while?