Mannivu@feddit.it to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 days agoTIL that Truth Social is (was?) based on Mastodonuk.pcmag.comexternal-linkmessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up1190
arrow-up1190external-linkTIL that Truth Social is (was?) based on Mastodonuk.pcmag.comMannivu@feddit.it to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 days agomessage-square28linkfedilink
minus-squarehomes@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·14 days agoNo, they didn’t. That’s the point.
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-214 days agoIs the source avalible? At the end, the license terms are met Knowing how incompetent trump is in everything he does, the people he employedfor the job didn’t know anything about software licenses Edit: I was wrong
minus-squarehomes@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-214 days ago Is the source avalible? An earlier version of it, but not in compliance with the GPL license At the end, the license terms are met No, they weren’t. That’s the point.
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-214 days agohttps://help.truthsocial.com/legal/open-source/ As far as I can see, it’s the newest version of truth/mastadon. What terms of the AGPL license aren’t met. Edit: I was wrong
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·14 days agoFine, you’re right, that version isn’t the newest one and isn’t released according to AGPL license.
minus-squarePlasticExistence@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·14 days agoIt’s refreshing to see someone admit they were wrong. It shouldn’t be a big deal because we’ve all been there.
minus-squareArmok_the_bunny@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·14 days agoThe problem is that the source code wasn’t uploaded by them.
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 days agoWho released it then? I’m not talking about the github mirror
No, they didn’t. That’s the point.
Is the source avalible?
At the end, the license terms are met
Knowing how incompetent trump is in everything he does, the people he employedfor the job didn’t know anything about software licenses
Edit: I was wrong
An earlier version of it, but not in compliance with the GPL license
No, they weren’t. That’s the point.
https://help.truthsocial.com/legal/open-source/
As far as I can see, it’s the newest version of truth/mastadon.
What terms of the AGPL license aren’t met.
Edit: I was wrong
Blocked
Fine, you’re right, that version isn’t the newest one and isn’t released according to AGPL license.
It’s refreshing to see someone admit they were wrong. It shouldn’t be a big deal because we’ve all been there.
The problem is that the source code wasn’t uploaded by them.
Who released it then? I’m not talking about the github mirror