• Ascend910@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Me: I need a flute for my orchestra performance
    Yamaha: No problem, here’s our 800W Series.
    Me: You wouldn’t happen to know where I can
    get a heavy 600 cc sport bike with the stop speed of 260km would you?
    Yamaha: You’re not gonna believe this

    • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      ME: The concert’s on a boat by the way, and we need power really soon. Do you happen to have outboard boat motors?

      YAMAHA: Have I got something for you right here.

    • Cypher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Gear it right (or wrong I guess) and that 600cc WILL hit 300km/h. They put out the same power the original hyperbikes did.

    • SqueezeMeMacaroni@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yamaha often gets overlooked for instruments, I think a lot of this is that we don’t expect a company that makes jetskis and motorcycles to also know what they’re doing with guitars, saxophones, and pianos, but they actually make good quality stuff.

      It’s more accurate to think of Yamaha as a conglomerate that owns several different companies. It’s just that a lot of those smaller companies are also named Yamaha

      Fun fact, the Yamaha logo is an image of three tuning forks, laid atop each other.

  • Subverb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    Brother (the printer company), makes world-class sewing machines. Home use and heavy commercial.

  • hungry_freaks_daddy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    Me: I need a trumpet, a xylophone, full drum kit, an electric guitar, a full PA system and a grand piano for my jazz show

    Yamaha: I got you

    Me: I also need a motorcycle to get there and a set of golf clubs for Sunday

    Yamaha: I gotchu there too

  • aluminium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Man, this Smart fridge is amazing. Do you, by any chance, happen to make self propelled atillery tanks as well?

  • craftyindividual@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hold up before you place the order! I need train carriages, a supercomputer, radiotherapy equipment, nuclear power plant, aircon, self propelled artillery and an escalator. Don’t ask me why.

    • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Is that a hotel for shills?

      Also, what does Bugatti make other than cars? (I found they used to make trains)

      • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Of course they may have just bought it from another company. But on an old top gear episode they have a 180K wrist watch from bugatti.

        Now that i think of it

        Peugeot also fit this theme. Bombs, cars, bikes, and pepper mills.

  • nednobbins@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    These weird combinations look fun but they’re generally the result of having conglomerates, companies that have gobbled up a bunch of smaller, unrelated companies.

    Conglomerates are tricky to pull off because managing a lot of disparate business lines. A CEO who knows all about how to market construction equipment is likely to miss that one of their other products became an iconic sex toy years ago. The big problem is that more focused companies can typically outmaneuver you in their area of focus.

    Theoretically, there might be synergies that make your company more effective but normally, conglomeration is drag on the risk-adjusted rate of return on your company. It’s much easier to pull off when your government has strong protectionist policies or if there are officials you can bribe to keep out the competition.

    Why would a company do something that’s generally bad for the company? It’s generally good for the CEO. A CEO often has a very concentrated investment portfolio. Changes in the value of the company they’re running can have a huge impact on their personal wealth. Conglomeration allows a single company to be a diversified asset. It does it in a way that’s objectively worse for shareholders but better for the CEO.

    • masquenox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Koreas “chaebol” system isn’t just any kind of conglomerattion, though… it was based on the system the Japanese used to dominate Korea during it’s colonization of that country, which the US simply encouraged after the war. The dictatorships that followed basically ran with it… and now you have these gigantic, government-subsidized “chaebols” that is the epitome of “too big too fail.” South Korea is about as oligarchic as it gets.

      It’s utterly hilarious to me when “free market” cultists try to use South Korea as an example of how miraculous their fairy tale economic ideology is.

      • nednobbins@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s functionally close enough to a conglomerate though.

        I’m not exactly sure what ‘“free market” cultist’ is or if you’re accusing me of being one. Modern economists don’t normally align themselves with simplistic ideologies like “free market”, “communist” or “capitalist”. They’re aware of the historical and modern usage of these terms but they tend to focus on areas that are far to specific for those terms to even make sense. You won’t find a lot of economists that argue for complete Laissez-faire capitalism any more than you’ll find real economists arguing in favor of classical Marxism.

        There is general agreement that conglomeration benefits management more than shareholders. There’s general agreement that they are more likely to arise under some economic conditions and that those conditions usually aren’t associated with socially optimal economic policies.