• ransomwarelettuce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There is no doubt that AMD is a better company than NVIDIA in OSS terms.

    But don’t simp for a company, vote with your wallet and always look for the best and consumer friendly product.

    For now, not gonna lie AMD is pretty rad, but I hope next generation Intel GPUs are competitive.

    • Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think AMD is a great competitor and we need more competition to lay it to NVIDIA and AMD as well, BUT HOLY FUCK. I can’t stand AMD’s software/control panel vs NVIDIA’s.

  • glibg10b@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    AMD’s had some buggy drivers and misleading graphs, but they’re overall infinitely more consumer-friendly than Nvidia

  • Kaito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    AMD is the only real option for those of us using Linux. Nvidia’s weirdnesses regularly fill up support tickets on Linux forums it’s not even funny

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been using Linux on my desktop since 1995, have used a lot of nVidia cards and have yet to experience that weirdness you speak of.

  • Moubai@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    i can’t encode my video with amd gpu, this is why i stay with nvidia and his Nvenc. When amd will propose this kind of use, maybe i will change my gpu

  • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Keen to see how FSR3 ends up looking, if it comes within decent parity to DLSS3 it’s going to be amazing, considering it’s hardware agnostic so theoretically console devs can use it to boost framerates.

    • the_el_man@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      AMD confirmed works on console. First impressions by Digital Foundry etc said it exceeded expectations, however they weren’t allowed to play it. Hopefully lag isn’t terrible

    • bruhduh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Keen to see fsr4 as it’ll be response to dlss3.5 upscaling for ray tracing and hardware agnostic on top of that would be great

  • leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just bought my first Nvidia card since the TNT2. Up to today I always looked for the most FPS for the money.

    This time my focus was on energy efficiency, and the AMD cards suck at the moment. 4070 about 200w, 6800 about 300w. AMD really has to fix that.

    Regarding DLSS: I activated it in control, and it looks… off? Edges seem unsharp, not all the time, but often, sometimes only for a second, sometimes longer. I believe it is the only game I have that has support for it, but I’m not impressed.

    At OP: Brand loyality is the worst. Neither Nvidia nor AMD like you. Get the best value for your money.

    Btw, Nvidia needed an account to let me use their driver. Holy shit, that’s fucked up!

    • Phishr42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      4070 about 200w, 6800 about 300w. AMD really has to fix that.

      But if you compare cards from the same generation, like the 3070 and 6800, they’re much closer. Nvidia still has the edge, but the 3070 TGP is 220W vs the 6800 at 250W.

    • BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t necessarily need an account to use the Nvidia drivers, just if you want automatic updates through GeForce Experience. Not saying that’s any better, in fact it’s almost as shitty, just wanted to clarify.

      I just used a junk email to make an account for the auto updates.

  • SaltyLemon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    AMD has been great and all buy their prices are NOT affordable. They’ve been jaking up their prices like everyone else in the last years. Don’t paint them as the heroes.

  • 6502@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like AMD but they’re still overpriced, nothing compelling in the $200-300 range since 5600 XT and RX 580, and I keep hearing stories about unoptimized drivers (can’t confirm myself cause I’m still on 5600 XT with mostly older games). They’re the lesser of two evils, but they’re far from chad-doge behavior at this point.

    • bi_tux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I got a new rx6700 xt 2 months ago for 250€ and I must say that I’m very happy with it. It performs well in newer games and got 12gb vram.

  • tomi000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Still everyone uses Nvidia and everything has better Nvidia support than AMD. I love AMD but not being able to use my oculus connected to my PC without screen tear is pretty annoying :/

  • Crabhands@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get it, however when I’m paying $1000+ for a GPU, I want the best for my money now. Not take part in some bigger than me ploy to even out companies.

    Government regulations > a few people buying a worse GPU

    • Spudwart@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Genuinely what are you talking about?

      RX 7800 xt is dropping beginning of next month at $500 and it’s a beast of a GPU.

      • EatBorekYouWreck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah sure, but it’s not comparable to an 80 series. The 7900xt costs $900 and the xtx costs $1000 at msrp. Thats a ton of money.

        The 4070 costs $600 btw, which is more comparable to the 7800xt you mentioned

    • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but the same thing can be said about phones, it’s the new norm and for something that’ll easily last you 4-6 years, it’s a worthwhile investment I feel

  • Muz333@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact is DLSS is really good and weird naming convention aside DLSS 3.5 (which works on all RTX cards, unlike DLSS 3) looks fantastic.

    I bought my last two cards solely for DLSS support and unless AMD steps up my next card will likely be Nvidia as well.

    • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      From the tiny amount we’ve seen of it (and what the digital foundry guys were about to discuss), it looks like DLSS3.5 with ray reconstruction may actually be a game changer, pretty ray traced lighting with inbuilt anti aliasing without a performance hit. Be keen to see how it actually looks with cyberpunk when it comes out.

    • leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I tried DLSS for the first time with Control, and it looks weird. Edges and lines are unsharp, sometimes for a second, sometimes longer. It kind of looks off.

      I activated it in-game, is there something else I have to do? Am I missing something?