257m@lemmy.ml to Programming@programming.dev · 1 year agoWhat are your programming hot takes?message-squaremessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up113
arrow-up113message-squareWhat are your programming hot takes?257m@lemmy.ml to Programming@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square114fedilink
minus-squareDigital Mark@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoTerrible projects are terrible because of the developers, not because of the language. I find dynamic projects easier to refactor and fix, just write some tests and if it’s green bar before and after, you’re fine.
minus-squareT (they/she)@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year ago…did you ever work with business/product people?
minus-squareDigital Mark@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoAll my career. They can’t program, they have no valid opinion about programming, as long as we finish the user stories. Which is several times faster in a nice dynamic language than a bondage language.
Terrible projects are terrible because of the developers, not because of the language.
I find dynamic projects easier to refactor and fix, just write some tests and if it’s green bar before and after, you’re fine.
…did you ever work with business/product people?
All my career. They can’t program, they have no valid opinion about programming, as long as we finish the user stories. Which is several times faster in a nice dynamic language than a bondage language.