• Noite_Etion@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              Dialect coach Meier understands the appeal of the idea that 17th-Century speech patterns have been perfectly preserved an ocean away. “It is a delightful and attractive myth that Shakespeare’s language got fossilised” in parts of the US.

              Not a great source honestly, was expecting more of a linguistic study rather than this. Even the article doesn’t entirely agree this is true.

              English is a living language that has continued to evolve within its country of origin. Is your point that because the American dialect hasn’t evolved as much suddenly makes it better somehow?

              Additionally, English is the most common language on the planet and there are many dialects, but no one outside of England can claim theirs is the “correct form of english” because it’s not their language.

            • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              This literally says what you’re saying isn’t true, except for the vague pronunciation of a single letter in one part of the US

              Did you even read it? 😂

    • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      British English is not some monolith and was less homogeneous than it even is now at the time many were coming to the Americas. If this were true it would only be true for a particular region. English outside of the UK also diverged as it no longer followed trends happening there, and regional variations went in sometimes different directions.

      Even within the US, English isn’t super homogeneous. Look at Appalachian compared to California or someplace. Parts of Louisiana have unique features from Accadian and influence from Spanish.