• Aurix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    Still not a pedophile nor a predator even for flirting. This is not a 12 year old, but in many jurisdictions a responsible adult.

      • Aurix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, he is mainly a cheater on his wife. Not exactly great, but conversations on this sound like by people who never leave their basement and talk to people.

        • Aurix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          5 months ago

          A pedophile predator is somebody who systematically texts underage people, and fishes out the vulnerable ones to exploit their weaknesses for their own satisfaction and exerts control over them. Speaking to a single, depending on the jurisdiction (±1 year), consenting adult (17 is young, but not completely stupid), with slightly flirty messages is absolutely not that. it isn’t even toxic. in fact, it devalues this tag for behaviour which is not cool due to the cheating and a bit skittish because of the age difference, but is otherwise kind of okay. See, next time somebody tells me about a pedophile predator I will be thinking about a conversation between two adults, or almost adult and not nasty abuse scarring people for life.

          • Akrenion@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            5 months ago

            Have you talked to 17 year olds? They are far from developed in most cases. Anyone even in their late 20s should notice the difference in development and stay clear.

          • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah that’s a fair take.

            It is reprehensible and disgusting behavior, but it doesn’t mean we should universally apply labels across vast swaths of different issues, as it devalues said label and poisons future discussion.

            Simple labels simplify discussion of course, but that runs the risk of losing nuance for the specific way someone was a disgusting creep.

                • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  So you agree that Beahm is a pedo? You replied to a person that does not think he is a pedo with “fair take”. Maybe you replied to the wrong person.

                  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Yeah I do. I disagree with most of their posts, but I agree with the motion that using the same labels indiscriminately is a problem in online discourse.

                    For example, far as I know so far, I’d call him a pedo, but I am unsure whether I’d call him a predator (of course, language differences apply, too). That’s just because I need words to express the predatory nature of people like Maxwell who prey on teens and YA.

                    That’s kinda what I meant, there’s too few words to just use the same label across the board sometimes. Doesn’t make something someone does less reprehensible. Rather i prefer to sometimes use full sentences instead of quick labels because it more accurately expresses the matter.

          • Aurix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            No point in leaving the windowless van, if I chained my highscool girlfriend inside it.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Not in the jurisdiction he was in, and that’s all that matters.

      Also, while sending sexually explicit texts to minors (using only words) is not illegal, I’m pretty sure we can correlate what his intent was. What, do you think he’s going to come out and fully admit he’s a pedophile? No.

      Also, nowhere in any of his statements has he clarified that he didn’t know they were underage. If it were the case that he didn’t know, that’s a pretty fucking big deal and he should know how important it is to explain that. He didn’t though.

      Stop defending pedophiles.