• prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Because teaching isn’t about having the smart kid demonstrate that they know the answer, it’s about getting the kid who doesn’t understand the question to engage and learn.

    Any of you who may one day have children would do well to understand the above.

    • ultimitchow@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      i can’t think of a better way to get shy kids to engage and learn than to figuratively put them on a pedestal in front of the whole class and have them demonstrate that they don’t know the answer.

      • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Plenty of shy kids don’t raise their hand even if they do know or could quickly find the answer with a little engagement.

        Yes, it’s uncomfortable for them to pick them anyway but it’s better than just giving them a bad grade.

    • Johanno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I understand that but one teacher completely killed my joy in a subject. He at some point never took me to answer a question even when I was the only one raising a hand. So I stopped contributing.

        • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sure, how? Engagement is a tricky thing, and kids “cheat” on homework and look up answers. Hearing from a student in class is the best way for me to see their thought process.

          • p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Is there a reason you can’t simply keep this child in for a few minutes when everyone is on recess to ask them what they’re struggling with?