• Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    237
    ·
    6 days ago

    When one of the first things you mention about him is “$280B of revenue” as though that’s a good thing in the context of health insurance, yeah, fuck you.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      5 days ago

      That much revenue isn’t, by itself, the bad part. Revenue is just how much you take in from your sales. If they had minimal overhead and paid the majority of that out to claims, that would be fine (in the context of our existing healthcare system). The problem is the profit, how much of that $280B goes into the company’s pockets instead of claim payouts.

          • Nougat@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            5 days ago

            Ah yes, I forgot that a person’s value is measured only by how much revenue they produce.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              They didn’t claim that though? They went on to talk about other factors too. The point of mentioning revenue was to portray him as “the American Dream”, going from a small town to leading a major company.

              Keep in mind I’m not defending the guy, but I don’t see the point in being purposely obtuse

    • Laser@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      He wanted to write that UHC saved X lives during his tenure, but he didn’t want to write something probably wrong, so he went with this instead.