• Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It made $2 billion but I don’t know anyone that saw it. Or if they did, they didn’t talk about it.

    • deus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I saw it. I enjoyed it a lot. Pandora’s seas look even more stunning than the forest did in the first movie. Loved meeting the Omatikaya clan and Jake’s new family (Spider and Kiri too, of course). Also, Quaritch being reborn as a Na’vi made him a much scarier and more interesting antagonist than he was. Can’t wait to see what Cameron has in store for us in the sequels.

    • angrymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I saw it, it was shit, specially because I remember the first. The plot of the 2 is horrible, even comparing with first that was generic.

      The story moves around the fact that humans want to get rid of blue ppl from a place to explore mineral resources, the leadr of the blues go away, instead of massacre the blue ppl they go for the leader in another place (???)

      And half of the movie is just kids doing shit to help the plot show the water, this movie was a long and slow torture.

      • 1simpletailer@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Holy shit do these movies need to edited down. Watched the latest one a few weeks ago and man was it 90 minutes of plot stretched into a 3 hour film. Felt like I was just watching James Cameron fellate himself on screen. Oh yeah Jimmy, such a beautiful and imaginative world. Shame it’s wasted on the blandest characters and most simplistic themes imaginable.

        • angrymouse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          I believe if was 80 minutes I would remember it as a good movie and a visual masterpiece, but now I remember as a slugg story that destroyed a technical achievement.

      • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        I watched it in 3D on mushrooms. It was one hell of an experience that way, but my god it felt like it lasted 10 hours

        • angrymouse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          I saw 3D as well and It was undisputable beautiful, but half of the movie I didn’t see, I was rolling my eyes. I Just can’t accept how a movie so expensive was unable to create a plot aligned with the Idea of a visual masterpiece.

          • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah, my friend was over it as soon as he saw humans sent the same exact general who got his ass kicked the first time back to try to do the exact same thing. Obviously it can’t be 100% realistic but if there was any suspension of disbelief at all it could have been so much better

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        If I remember correctly, Sarge (no idea wtf his name is) had a vendetta and the folks not in his direct circle of troops were hesitant to allow his pursuit of Jake.

        Don’t mistake this as some defense of perfect writing, it wasn’t my favorite or anything, but I do think that was talked about.

        • angrymouse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          But iirc the general also sent soldiers after Sarge (I also don’t remember his name) to kill Jake, it was not just the vendetta guy

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah, like once Sarge convinced them they were on board but I could’ve sworn there was at least hesitancy. His argument was something like Jake is a symbol? Idk.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah you don’t remember his name. Action and horror movies depend almost solely on the strength of the villain. So when no one can remember even the name of the villain what does it say about the movie?

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I don’t remember characters’ names from movies I love either though. I’m very bad with people’s names as well.

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Of course I do, I’m just saying it’s very common for me to forget. I loved Scream but I can only remember Tatum. Matthew Lillard I kept calling Shaggy. I recently saw Insidious again and I remember like, Elaine? And that’s it. My memory of characters’ names doesn’t seem to correlate very strongly with the quality of the movie.

      • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well if you only watch it on a small screen that makes sense. In Imax 3D it was stunning, and very engrossing.

          • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            And that’s a problem?

            I still enjoyed the story, but being so drawn in by the world is what certainly helped make it more enjoyable.

            • wombatula@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Once it leaves theatres, of course that is a problem lmao. Where can I go see it in imax 3d? Spend half a million dollars on a home cinema?

              I watch most movies at home, as do most people (especially since covid), if I can’t even buy tickets to the theme park then what interest is it to me?

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          The special effects were beautiful it was the plot that was the problem. Pretty much the same as the first one.

    • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I saw it in Imax and had a great time. I know several people who also saw it and loved it.

    • Magister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      As a lot of people I saw the first one in 3D IMAX surrounds DTS whatever. Once. Never watched it again. Never saw the second one.

    • WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I heard many people mention it. I think mostly high schoolers (I work in education)? Probably the same people who watch anything that’s trending news. People I know who are actually old enough to see the original in theatres mostly seemed uninterested.

  • spudwart@spudwart.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Pros: As an effect of him writing the script in the 90s, the movie feels like a 90s movie with modern fx.

    Cons: As an effect of him writing the script in the 90s, the movie feels like a 90s movie, with ancient overdone tropes, including the racist ones.

      • 1simpletailer@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I mean the Na’vi are an infantilized hodgepodge of several shallow stereotypes of indigenous people precision designed to be sexy so the lowest common denominator sympathizes with them. The commenter may be referring to that.

          • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago
            • The manner in which they talk
            • the lack of technology greater than bows and arrows
            • all plants and animals are treated as sacred
            • outsiders are not welcome
            • clothing that only covers up the naughty bits

            The Na’vi are basically native American stereotypes in every conceivable way, except blue and have tails.

            • IdealShrew@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Is that not all true even for some tribes today? I don’t mean native American, but for example look at the people on Sentinel Island or similar - I think this is what they were going for with the NaVi

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 months ago

    Gotta love the realistic space ships.

    Literally melted in my seat when I saw the radiators. FUCKING incredible

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        This is precisely it. Avatar had originally the exact same problem that the Way of the Water has now. They’re tech demos. Interesting, pretty, they move people to see what’s what on the theater. But, offer close to nothing emotionally or culturally resonant. It’s like a generic roller-coaster, you show up, enjoy the ride, then go get some fries having nothing deeper to say about the experience because the experience doesn’t offer anything deep. It doesn’t mean the movies are bad or that they weren’t enjoyable, that’s why they made so much money. But there’s no conversation to have around them except to remark on how much they cost to make, or how did the CGI looked like or whether other studios will use the tech invented for this movie on other movies. Plot, characters and symbolism are shallow pools. Specially to an audience that is sick and tired of mega blockbuster sequels.

  • Rin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m assuming the sequel is also forgettable considering that I’ve barely heard a thing about the plot.

  • thorbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    My wife and I started watching the second avatar and we turned it off about 90 minutes in, just couldn’t be bothered to care or watch it any more. And we never finished it. What a piece of crap

    • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      Watched it in IMAX 3d with my kid. It ruled, so much fun to watch. Will never watch it again though, and certainly never at home. That defeats the entire purpose.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Me being charitable: if you enjoyed the first you are most likely going to enjoy the second. If you are over the age of 12 and have seen more than 8 movies in your life you are probably not going to enjoy it.

  • kttnpunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    It was such a bad movie too. Dude was really just like “let’s remake the first movie, but wetter”

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      And no character arcs for anyone. Well except for Quarich, he was literally the only reason to see the movie and even his character was boring as shit.

  • Bonehead@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    So it may have taken 13 years to come back with a sequel that no one asked for and no one expected. But at least he gave us something. Unlike a certain South African director that shall remain nameless…3 years my ass…

  • doktorseven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve always called bullshit on the second movie making that much damn money. There’s no way. Not nearly that many people cared about it at all, I seriously think somebody faked that attendance.

    • Belgdore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      The franchise is huge in China. Just because your group didn’t like it doesn’t mean they are faking anything

      • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Im apparently the only person on the face of mother earth who genuinely liked the first movie… I did, no really. But the second one literally had nothing of interest in it. It looked the same, sounded the same, had the same characters and all that, but the movie when nowhere for 3 hours. I dont think I can ever sit through it again.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    He can’t keep getting away with it!

    I feel like there was a good movie in Avatar 2 but a lot of the scenes looked like they didn’t render them fully. The FPS changes felt random. If they’d done ALL action in 48 and ALL dialogue in 24 it wouldn’t have been as bad.

    The scenes of the kids rescuing the parents were so gorgeous. Stunning. But compare that to the scene of the boat jumping and crashing? Insane how shitty it looked.