• Ertebolle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That was more than 200 years ago - 2/3 of the states didn’t exist yet - and it ended in a mostly pointless stalemate.

    • nicktron@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is this the war of 1812 where Canada burned down your first White House? That pointless stalemate?

      • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        British troops did that, specifically British troops who had never set foot in British North America, let alone Canada, which didn’t exist. And yes, any war that ends in status que ante bellum is pointless.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sorta… Wars can be about more than territory, which is all that term refers to.

          America achieved all its stated goals for the war, which didn’t include “Actually this is mostly just a war of conquest we hope you’re too busy to defend against.” It just conveniently doesn’t mention a couple had already happened, and it would have been gauche to admit we really just wanted the territory.