• NickwithaC@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      27 days ago

      Seriously! Even back in 2007 I was all “chrome is faster? Great, now Firefox has some competition” I never switched to chrome. You couldn’t pay me to use that privacy nightmare.

      • jdeath@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        27 days ago

        I used it when it was new and google didn’t seem so bad. Google even sent me one of the original Chromebook prototypes (CH-47) before they launched as a product for sale. i don’t know when it started to become clear that google was going evil, but around 10 years ago it was really obvious where things were headed.

        • frostysauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          27 days ago

          i don’t know when it started to become clear that google was going evil

          It was around the time they removed “Don’t be evil” from their official philosophy.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      I moved to Chrome after years of using Firefox when FireFox was having tons of issues that Chrome resolved.

      Most of them are fixed now. Though it still has issues with selection boxes on some websites forcing me to use Chrome again for them. At least they’re government sites, mostly, so there’s no ads needing to be blocked… Yet.

  • jdeath@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    27 days ago

    i haven’t used chrome in over ten years. i could never understand why anyone the least bit nerdy would use it, but that’s autism for ya

      • babybus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        27 days ago

        What UI? Both browsers render one line with tabs and the address bar below. They’re almost identical.

      • 0x0@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        What exactly is “clean” about a ui that doesnt conform to the os ui standards…? The ui is basically bloated because of it.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        27 days ago

        Could you be more specific? I’ve been using ff regularly for a long time now and never feel like the UI is getting in the way, though I do use a tab groups add-on to help manage my mess of open tabs. But I also haven’t used Chrome for even longer than I’ve been using ff, so I’m curious about what specific ways you think the chrome ui is better.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            27 days ago

            In my UI (on desktop), tabs take up the title bar and all the other necessary buttons fit in the row with the address field. I’ve also got a bookmarks bar below that but it’s optional. There’s also the optional sidebar that I do use but mostly keep hidden.

            For menus, there’s the tab menu that is a button on the tab row and is mostly filled with open tabs plus 4 other items. Then there’s the main menu with 19 items. Tbf, one is undesired (log in for sync) and at least 7 are redundant (as in if they weren’t there, I’d still have easy access to their functionality), but I find menus are easier to discover features through (and hate how MS wants to get rid of them) and am ok with the redundancy.

            There’s also various context menus, but I’ve never found them to be obtrusive.

            This is the state after some customization, but not a crazy amount. If I install FF on a new system, I can usually get it to a point where I’m happy with it pretty quickly.

            If you mean the mobile version, I can understand that a bit more but personally prefer the screen space to be used up to expose more functionality. On mobile, I’ve felt like FF gives me the most power that feels closest to what I can do on a desktop, though tbf it’s been a while since I used other browsers (excluding electron stuff or apps that integrate Chrome or Google Web view for web browsing rather than letting me use my preferred browser, though I’ve never felt happy with the more minimalist UI instead of the capabilities FF exposes).

            I also haven’t tried librewolf and don’t know if the same UI is possible there.

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              27 days ago

              I actually like the UI of the mobile version. I am also used to Firefox at this point but when I first moved it was painful. I think they should polish up the UI and focus on minimalism I stead of cramming in new features

    • mrbaby@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      FF has been my daily driver for at least a decade, but I gotta test my web apps in everything :/

      • Johnmannesca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        I kinda prefer Vivaldi for testing chromium-based browsers. I guess MS Edge would be a similar experience too nowadays

        • mrbaby@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          26 days ago

          Vivaldi is so pretty, I hide pretty much everything from the interface and use it for making product demo and training videos. I considered using it as a daily but I’ve got FF set up just the way I like it.

          I draw the line at installing edge on my linux machine! I just figure that if chrome works then edge works and haven’t had anyone report any issues.

          Safari is the real pain in the butt…

    • Prox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      Tab groups. I switched from Chrome to Firefox when all this Manifest V3 stuff started, and I’m still looking for a Firefox extension that works as well and looks as clean as the way Chrome handles tab grouping.

    • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      27 days ago

      so many webapps and logins dont work properly in ff. or lets call it AdFox for now while they’re still selling us out to alphabet. so autism is when you just see black or white. chrome isnt bad overall…they have a UX, AdFox isnt good overall for too many reasons. i hope we’ll get a real browser before the web is dead.

        • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          27 days ago

          Right? What kind of wildly niche activities are people doing where FF doesn’t work? All of my stuff works, and I’ve never had any weirdness. I browse art, shop online, do social media (a little), check my email, use auction sites, and watch Plex and other streaming services.

          There must be an entire corner of the internet I don’t even know about.

      • Briguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        26 days ago

        I’ve been using Firefox consistently since the beginning in 2004. And Netscape navigator before that. And I have never had these issues you speak of. I never made the switch to chrome when it was released because I always hated the look of it. Firefox does everything anyone needs to do. I don’t understand how some people struggle so much.

        • LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          26 days ago

          Firefox does everything anyone needs to do. I don’t understand how some people struggle so much.

          I’ve always wondered what it is that people are doing when they say that FF is too slow or inadequate in some way. But elsewhere in this thread to be found:

          There’s only like one notable website I’ve had to use chromium for instead of Firefox.

          The website for recalibrating a Google Pixel’s fingerprint sensor. I’ve had to use that website twice, and I just used Microsoft Edge to do it since I can’t uninstall it.

          Absolutely wild.

          I would use firefox, but youtube is basically unusable on it.

          Also wild.

          • John@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            All stuff which is using web serial doesnt work in ff(esp-home or the Installation Of grapheneOS for example). But for this rare tasks i have ungoogled chromium. My daily driver is Zen

    • Blaster M@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      I have run Ungoogled Chromium, Thorium, and Vivaldi, and all of them perform much faster and better than Librewolf.

      And Librewolf is my daily driver.

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    27 days ago

    If you haven’t used Firefox in 3+ years, its improved a lot. For 99% of people its interchangeable with Chrome except for being in the Google ecosystem.

    • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      no. everytime its more shit. slap AI or autotranslate on it while no user hat that top prioritised. this shit stupid search in the middle that takes your cusor to magicbar or what that crap is called. pocket…fuck it. it takes longer to debloat firefox than finding an alternative. shit default search, shit ceo… moz has become 99% worse. TB was so good it had to go to keep the bar super low for future moz releases. devs are the worst in how they handled feature request while taking money from google.

        • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          well either you use it and thats fine eventhough much culture gets lost in translation. or you dont use it at all like me and is just more bloat like shitty pocket. overall i want to chose what to install. my ff profile is so old with every update the first start after update takes ages…and mostly because adfox added stuff i didnt ask for. why is moz so stupid? other plattforms (osx, atlassian jira, slack) allow me to add functionality through their stores but keep the original product clean. adfox goes like slapping shit on everything. lets add AI to improve my searches…ah, why not use ai to do the entire browsing? and thats how idiocracy started.

          • InputZero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            26 days ago

            I’m as frustrated as the next person here when it comes to how AI is crammed into products, but translation between languages is one of the few things AI can be good at. A lot gets lost in translation, sure, but everything is lost when it’s not translated at all. Are we expected to have official translaters for everything? I use it most often translating explanations of how to fix a chunk of code. Someone else solved the problem except that it’s not in a language I understand, one quick AI translation and I can understand what their solution was and deploy it myself. I couldn’t do that ten years ago. Most AI is hot garbage but I find translation AI very useful.

      • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        How come you don’t have a usename? Or is it a bug on my side?

        BTW, I’m super happy with translation and AI in ff. I guess not every users wants the same, especially for those with english as first langage.

        • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          name is using non latin characters, so id just imagine youre using an app or browser that doesnt support the character codes for it

  • Praise Idleness@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    27 days ago

    I’ve been using Librewolf for quite a time now. Any other recommendations? No reason. Just got brow-curious.

    Zen wasn’t all that good. Not polished.

    • Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’m on Librewolf too. Recently its been fully signing me out of my extensions on every startup, so I can’t just unlock bitwarden with my pin anymore. Anyone else run into this?

      • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        That was a bug in the bw extension, it’s not unique to LW

        E: I use LW and bw and had this issue a couple of months ago, but it’s been back to normal for a month+

    • Cornflake@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      I love Librewolf too, and if you’re looking to explore other options I do recommend giving the Mullvad Browser a go. It’s another firefox fork but I believe it handles fingerprinting in a better manner. Similarly, it comes with uBlock Origin built in but also NoScript. I’d likely use it as my primary browser but I don’t really care for NoScript and removing the extension would ultimately defeat the fingerprint resistance of Mullvad.

      • Hugucinogens@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        There is no Firefox without people’s desire for privacy. There is no sufficient privacy without people removing the diseased fingerprint of multiple big companies.

        There is no possibility of a big browser surviving, without caving to big companies, in the artificially hostile web created by Google’s monopoly.

        And that last one is fundamentally unfair, beyond any accusation of “Derivative!” anyone can make.

        • greedytacothief@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          27 days ago

          I actually switched back to Firefox (from chrome) about 5 or 6 years ago because I liked the interface more. And I still like the Firefox design decisions more than what chrome is doing.

          Privacy is nice too but people come to Firefox for lots of reasons.

      • Loren@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        27 days ago

        This tbh. I know Mozilla has been up to some questionable things lately but I only just got a bunch of my friends to finally ditch Chrome.

  • Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    27 days ago

    It’s sad that firefox only exists to keep chrome from becoming a monopoly, around 80% of Mozilla’s income is from Google to keep google.com the default search engine.

    I tried Vivaldi and honestly it looks and feel amazing, but the issue is that it’s chromium based, but if mozilla put more effort in actually working on firefox, I would love it even more. Wish librewolf had a mobile app

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    You might want to keep looking for better friends. Firefox recently got busted tracking users without their consent

    https://noyb.eu/en/firefox-tracks-you-privacy-preserving-feature

    With a recent Firefox update, Mozilla seems to have taken a leaf out of Google’s playbook: without directly telling its users, the company has secretly enabled a so-called “Privacy Preserving Attribution” (PPA) feature. Similar to Google’s (failed) Privacy Sandbox, this turned the browser into a tracking tool for websites.

    Edit: i am not saying that Firefox is bad. I just wouldn’t call it a friend, let alone a best friend

    • Dasnap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      27 days ago

      Well, when there’s only really 2 friends available, and the other options are just those guys in different hats…

    • Cornflake@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      27 days ago

      Y’all can downvote this person but they aren’t necessarily wrong. Unfortunately, it seems you have to pick the poison you know in the browser space or take a risk with something else. And something else is usually just one of those original poisons wearing a different label. That said, there are some projects that tend to be of better form than others. Consider the Mullvad Browser and Librewolf. Those two are built on Firefox but are “fixed” enough to mitigate the crap Firefox has done. For Android, I believe Mull browser is the best one can get right now, it’s like a mobile Arkenfox.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        27 days ago

        The story is an overblown nothingburger and would make Firefox still the massively better choice. This is just agenda pushing at this point. But hey, keep using Chrome if you think they preserve your privacy and the web in a better way. No one is forcing you to use a Firefox based browser.

        • Cornflake@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          I don’t think there’s any sense in overlooking flaws just because something is overall better. Firefox is the massively better choice if the goal is to avoid data collection. However, I don’t think that means it’s fair to let things slide so easily. A community that calls out its developers when they make a mistake can ultimately improve things, and prevents devs from saying “they won’t understand and they won’t care.” Firefox isn’t a total angel when it comes to data collection, I mean telemetry being opt-out instead of opt-in is a pretty big boon, even if it’s not as bad as it is in other browsers. I’m not sure what agenda you believe is being pushed here, I never once suggested folks jump ship from Firefox to Chrome.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      27 days ago

      What else are you going to use honestly. I use Librewolf but that still is Firefox based.

      It is funny to me that they call targeted advertising “privacy preserving”

  • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    27 days ago

    There’s only like one notable website I’ve had to use chromium for instead of Firefox.

    The website for recalibrating a Google Pixel’s fingerprint sensor. I’ve had to use that website twice, and I just used Microsoft Edge to do it since I can’t uninstall it.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Which site?!? I like my pixel but the fingerprint sensor is like it was made by insane baboons

      • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        https://pixelrepair.withgoogle.com/

        Worth noting that the calibration is for when you replace your phone screen, because often the phone screen comes with a new fingerprint scanner and for some reason the phone won’t recognize it without a firmware update.

        IDK what pixel you have, but iirc some of them are just known for having kinda shitty scanners. I have a pixel six with a glass screen protector and I often have to try more than once.

  • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    27 days ago

    The feature isn’t even mentioned in Mozilla’s data protection policies. The only way for users to turn it off is to find the opt-out function in a sub-menu of the browser’s settings.

    Irritatingly, a Mozilla developer justifies the move by claiming that users can’t make an informed decision.

    This is all IN ADDITION to them turning on DoH (DNS over HTTP) without permission which nullifies ad blockers.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      27 days ago

      We have heard this a million times. The feature you’re referencing is a net positive for privacy and yet the zealots just cannot accept that fact.

      • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        First of all, every would is true. Nanana boo-boo is not a rebuttal.

        Second, if it is so awesome for people and not about tracking, why do you sneak in changes that circumvent anti tracking without telling people about it and burying the change in submenus?

        How many people regularly read submenus?

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      27 days ago

      DNS over HTTPS is very good for privacy and security. Even Librewolf turns it on.

      Putting ads in Firefox is bad in so many ways but encrypted DNS is good as it keeps DNS actually secure.

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        Not if you leave it at default, which is cloudflare, and is the only option. Fuckers MITM-ed half the internet, and now they’re after DNS. I’d rather trust my ISP and NSA more than them.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          26 days ago

          There are a relatively small amount of DNS over HTTPS servers. It makes sense they would go with a bigger company. Also having it on by default bypasses a lot of censorship.

          I don’t like Cloudflare and I personally switched it to quad9

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    Really enjoying Zen browser this week, may be my new favorite. The tab handling is VERY weird at first though.

    • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      27 days ago

      I find that interesting because I hear it a lot, yet I’ve never had a problem with it. I use all the usual adblocks and whatnot, but it runs fine.

        • ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          I’d recommend backing up your bookmarks, then delete your profile in C:\Users\YourName\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\

          Reinstall only uBlock Origin, then give Firefox another shot.

        • Addv4@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          27 days ago

          Maybe try an extension like chameleon? I’ve had it on with ublock when using YouTube for a bit, makes it seem like I’m using chrome to YouTube.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      27 days ago

      Not true. I haven’t used YouTube on anything but Firefox for a couple of years now. It’s 100% fine.

    • machinaeZER0@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      27 days ago

      When was the last time you tried it? There have been hiccups a few times where Ublock needed to push an update, but (at least on my end) those issues have tended to resolve quickly

      If YouTube is your only issue you could also just keep chrome around as a YouTube player and use Firefox for everything else - unless space is exceptionally tight on your system, a second browser isn’t the worst thing to have on hand :)

    • Prox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      This is super weird to hear. YouTube is way BETTER on FF for me. Videos load/play exactly as expected and my ad blocker still kills all the junk that I would have to put up with on Chrome.

      I haven’t figured out how to totally remove the stupid chat window on the right side of videos, but that’s true regardless of browser.

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      I don’t know why the downvotes. Sadly some webpages are made only thinking in chromium, thus working worse in other browsers.

      I have found the same issue with youtube. I still use firefox, but youtube under firefox works worse than under chrome or other chromium based browsers. Probably it’s google fault this, I’m certain they do it on purpose.

      Also clarify that I use an old computer that struggles a bit in general, so newer hardware may have not experience this, maybe?

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        27 days ago

        Sadly some webpages are made only thinking in chromium, thus working worse in other browsers.

        YT absolutely works in Firefox. I use it daily for many many years. The only thing that annoys me is that the fullscreen toggle is kinda sluggish but that’s not anything I’d use Chrome for.

        • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          I don’t use chrome over that. I prefer using tube archivist opened on firefox.

          But on my low spec computer for instance using YouTube on any Gecko based browser I get stutter audio over bluetooth, that does not happen on chromium based browsers.

          As the original commenter said that makes youtube unusable for me in firefox, but I still use alternatives to chrome. Other chromium based browsers or tube archivist is my choice.

  • dezmd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    27 days ago

    I need the quick and easy profile switching management in Firefox like I have in Chrome and I’ll never look back.